Where is the platform-based web2.0 era?
The significance of connection technology lies in the development of human creative nature
The infrastructure project of web3.0 - Tuolian.com
Let me tell you the truth, what the web2.0 era brings is the upgrade of teat music, the reason why he upgrades teat music is determined by this social mechanism.
We are in the era of capitalism. If the Internet can only be developed by enterprises and its audience is ordinary social animals, this Internet must be the garden for developing Naitoule products. It will have extremely limited changes in your life and will only kill your time. to make capital gains.
The Internet at this stage is a tool for capitalism to rule society, because it satisfies the two basic directions of value circulation in capitalist society:
1. Hitting workers' teat entertainment needs: In the 19th century, naked women were often thrown into coal mines, so that miners could have fun when they were tired, so that there would be no riots.
2. The need of capitalists to make money: capitalists still need to make money from the poor. Although the rich are rich, they have few people. Satisfy the teat pleasure needs of migrant workers.
In this way, this Internet has become an upgraded version of the industrial society of the 19th century. This is why many people think that the Internet is a waste of time, because its nature is such that it is not to provide you with value, but to provide you with fantasy.
As an advanced technology, the Internet itself is in such a dirty state of use. The fundamental reason is that the group that masters this technology is entrepreneurs. The reason why only entrepreneurs can use this technology is that the scene construction and dissemination of the network require huge costs, and the reason behind the huge costs is determined by the development stage of the web2.0 era Yes, because development in the web2.0 era needs to pay human costs, and communication also needs to pay promotion costs. One is the problem of low network productivity, and the other is caused by the problem of communication structure. And all of this can be changed by building products with zero code, and the network mechanism of decentralized communication can change, this is web3.0.
If you believe that the Internet is still necessary to develop, it is still a tool that can serve ordinary people, then what ordinary people need is not to enjoy the teats, people want to own this technology at low cost, and people want to bypass the platform and directly communicate with others People have beneficial intersections.
For example: to strengthen the connection between people, so that people can create greater value in social feedback.
If you are an expert in the development of autonomous driving, you open your scene positioning, and when people nearby see your homepage, what can you provide for them? Maybe if you don't go to this town, those men and women will not know you, and when you go, they find a very awesome person visiting, and those children will think: "how can I be like you"
Adults who think, "How do I choose a self-driving car?"
Those college students who think, "How do I get an internship at your company?"
People who are bright and lively think, "How do I become your car?" What about your assistant?"
If you have your own scene, you can have the choice to help a lot of people enrich their lives, open windows for their cognition, and provide many opportunities.
If you are an ordinary person, you also want to use the Internet to develop your own business. For example, you can concentrate on community services. You help this community organize cleaning and lawn maintenance, and you often nest green projects in other communities for everyone to see: such as mosquito repellent. Interesting projects such as , rooftop vegetable plots, etc., allow users of each building to crowdfund and organize relevant personnel to carry out production transformation. This is to transform the life around them with the help of decentralized scenes and communication.
If you are a community service worker, you can also fine-tune the operation of the surrounding world. If through your efforts, you can help the elderly in the community organize medical examinations and reduce the death of 20 people in this community every year, do you think this is the case? The value of life? If you are a high-achieving student and you share your courses nearby, you can teach offline to the same community. You help countless children receive a higher-level enlightenment education. Is this the value of life? Where there are people, there is room for optimal allocation of resources. This market is unlimited, because there is always room for optimization of human needs, and there is always room for technological advancement under the guidance of correct values. In feudal society, everyone serves the emperor, and what an emperor is, the emperor is a vampire in terms of class. And we are serving the community now, what are the people in the community? The people in the community are the core driving force for the development of this society, and it is demand that acts on supply.
Moreover, the effect of web3.0 is not dotted, but sweeping. Everyone who is idle at home and using Douyin suddenly has a tool that can transform life, which can show a person's creativity, and everyone's information threshold It's the same as the entry threshold, so I still want to watch the video? Everyone will be mobilized, and if they are not mobilized, they will be mobilized. They will improve themselves through output and feedback, and make themselves a person in a value circle of peace, rather than a vertically discrete and fragmented person.
If you can shape web3.0, according to the above usage scenario, we can say that there is no one in this world who does not recognize you as a great person.
Finally, the important point, I can't understand, web3.0 is very clear in logic, but why there are so many seemingly professional people talking nonsense, guessing and pointing, and speaking vaguely, I don't know what they are going to do, I think I asked what their purpose was. I neither like such a person nor want to know them. But if there is someone who agrees with me and is willing to do something, welcome to join, and we will go all the way.