前言
Android ANR问题一直是比较难解决的问题，一来它比较难以复现，二来复现后也不太好分析。这篇文章梳理一下ANR产生的过程以及出现ANR拿到日志文件如何定位原因。其实关于ANR线上监控也是比较棘手的，看了这篇文章我们再去看一些ANR端上监控方案(比如微信Matrix)也许思路更多清晰。
出现ANR时如下图：
ANR是什么
ANR表示应用长时间无响应，会在界面上弹出一个弹窗(如上图)。它并不是一个Runtime Exception，不能通过catch来捕获。并且它是System Server进程弹出来的，所以app进程感知不到(可以在native层感知，下文会分析)。出现ANR时，System Server进程会在Logcat里打印日志，并且会把更多详细的日志输出到/data/anr目录下以文件形式存放(一般叫它ANR trace文件)。
ANR产生原因
Android ANR一般由以下几个原因产生：
Service Timeout ：前台服务在20s内未执行完成，后台服务在200s未完成；
BroadcastQueue Timeout：前台广播在10s内完成，后台60s；
ContentProvider Timeout：Provider发布超时10s;
InputDispatching Timeout：输入事件处理超时5s，包括按键和触摸事件。
比较常见的场景是第四种，即输入事件响应超时，主要是触摸事件。为什么会超时呢？一般是因为主线程因为某些原因阻塞了，比如耗时任务、复杂计算、死锁、休眠等等。
ANR产生过程
Service Timeout表示Service组件生命周期函数比如onCreate处理超时。下面举例说明Service的onCreate生命周期函数是如何产生AAR的。
onCreate是在startSerice之后调用的，因此从startService说起。以下代码基于Android SDK 29。
流程如下：
然后重点看下ActiveServices.realStartServiceLocked函数的代码：
private final void realStartServiceLocked(ServiceRecord r,
ProcessRecord app, boolean execInFg) throws RemoteException {
...
//这个函数会发送一条延时20秒的消息
bumpServiceExecutingLocked(r, execInFg, "create");
...
try {
...
//通知app进程创建Service:这里面会调用onCreate生命周期函数
app.thread.scheduleCreateService(r, r.serviceInfo,
...
} catch (DeadObjectException e) {
...
bumpServiceExecutingLocked发送延时消息函数：
private final void bumpServiceExecutingLocked(ServiceRecord r, boolean fg, String why) {
...
scheduleServiceTimeoutLocked(r.app);
...
}
继续看scheduleServiceTimeoutLocked函数：
void scheduleServiceTimeoutLocked(ProcessRecord proc) {
//获取延时消息
Message msg = mAm.mHandler.obtainMessage(
ActivityManagerService.SERVICE_TIMEOUT_MSG);
msg.obj = proc;
//发送延时消息，前台服务是20秒，后台是200秒
mAm.mHandler.sendMessageDelayed(msg,
proc.execServicesFg ? SERVICE_TIMEOUT : SERVICE_BACKGROUND_TIMEOUT);
}
关于常量SERVICE_TIMEOUT和SERVICE_BACKGROUND_TIMEOUT的定义：
//路径：com.android.server.am.ActiveServices.java
// How long we wait for a service to finish executing.
static final int SERVICE_TIMEOUT = 20*1000;
// How long we wait for a service to finish executing.
static final int SERVICE_BACKGROUND_TIMEOUT = SERVICE_TIMEOUT * 10;
可见前台服务ANR时间是20秒，后台服务ANR时间是10倍也就是200秒。
继续看app进程的ActivityThread如何处理创建Service任务：
private void handleCreateService(CreateServiceData data) {
Service service = null;
try {
java.lang.ClassLoader cl = packageInfo.getClassLoader();
service = packageInfo.getAppFactory()
.instantiateService(cl, data.info.name, data.intent);
} catch (Exception e) {
...
}
try {
...
ContextImpl context = ContextImpl.createAppContext(this, packageInfo);
context.setOuterContext(service);
Application app = packageInfo.makeApplication(false, mInstrumentation);
service.attach(context, this, data.info.name, data.token, app,
ActivityManager.getService());
//重点：调用生命周期函数onCreate
service.onCreate();
mServices.put(data.token, service);
try {
//重点：通知AMS Service创建完成，会清除handler里的延时消息
ActivityManager.getService().serviceDoneExecuting(
data.token, SERVICE_DONE_EXECUTING_ANON, 0, 0);
} catch (RemoteException e) {
throw e.rethrowFromSystemServer();
}
,,,
service.onCreate之后会通知AMS service创建完成。
ActivityManagerService.serviceDoneExecuting方法会走到ActiveServices的
serviceDoneExecutingLocked：
private void serviceDoneExecutingLocked(ServiceRecord r, boolean inDestroying,boolean finishing) {
...
//移除之前发送的延时消息
mAm.mHandler.removeMessages(ActivityManagerService.SERVICE_TIMEOUT_MSG, r.app);
...
}
由此可见，Service的生命周期函数onCreate在20之内走完的话，延时消息就会从handler里清除，消息就不会执行。
如果Service的生命周期函数onCreate在20之内还没有走完的话，之前的发送的延时消息就会执行。
这个消息就是处理ANR的消息。
关于延时消息：SERVICE_TIMEOUT_MSG，MainHandler的处理如下：
//com.android.server.am.ActivityManagerService
final class MainHandler extends Handler {
public MainHandler(Looper looper) {
super(looper, null, true);
}
@Override
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
switch (msg.what) {
...
case SERVICE_TIMEOUT_MSG: {
mServices.serviceTimeout((ProcessRecord)msg.obj);
...
}
...
}
}
mServices.serviceTimeout的实现如下：
void serviceTimeout(ProcessRecord proc) {
...
proc.appNotResponding(null, null, null, null, false,
...
}
所以Service发生ANR会走到ProcessRecord.appNotResponding函数。
经过其它类型ANR的分析，它们也会走到ProcessRecord.appNotResponding函数，比如输入事件超时：
//com.android.server.am.ActivityManagerService
/**
* Handle input dispatching timeouts.
* @return whether input dispatching should be aborted or not.
*/
boolean inputDispatchingTimedOut(ProcessRecord proc, String activityShortComponentName,
ApplicationInfo aInfo, String parentShortComponentName,
WindowProcessController parentProcess, boolean aboveSystem, String reason) {
if (checkCallingPermission(FILTER_EVENTS) != PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) {
throw new SecurityException("Requires permission " + FILTER_EVENTS);
}
final String annotation;
if (reason == null) {
annotation = "Input dispatching timed out";
} else {
annotation = "Input dispatching timed out (" + reason + ")";
}
if (proc != null) {
synchronized (this) {
if (proc.isDebugging()) {
return false;
}
if (proc.getActiveInstrumentation() != null) {
Bundle info = new Bundle();
info.putString("shortMsg", "keyDispatchingTimedOut");
info.putString("longMsg", annotation);
finishInstrumentationLocked(proc, Activity.RESULT_CANCELED, info);
return true;
}
}
//输入事件超时同样也会走到ProcessRecord.appNotResponding
proc.appNotResponding(activityShortComponentName, aInfo,
parentShortComponentName, parentProcess, aboveSystem, annotation);
}
return true;
}
关于输入事件、广播、provider的超时处理流程就不一一分析了。
所以ProcessRecord.appNotResponding这个函数是殊路同归的，所有类型的ANR最终都会走这里。
处理ANR
处理ANR流程分为以下几个步骤：
详细过程如下：
//com.android.server.am.ProcessRecord
void appNotResponding(String activityShortComponentName, ApplicationInfo aInfo,
String parentShortComponentName, WindowProcessController parentProcess,
boolean aboveSystem, String annotation) {
//收集需要dump堆栈的进程id,分为firstPids、lastPids和nativeProcs
ArrayList<Integer> firstPids = new ArrayList<>(5);
SparseArray<Boolean> lastPids = new SparseArray<>(20);
synchronized (mService) {
...
// In case we come through here for the same app before completing
// this one, mark as anring now so we will bail out.
setNotResponding(true);
// Dump thread traces as quickly as we can, starting with "interesting" processes.
firstPids.add(pid);
// Don't dump other PIDs if it's a background ANR
if (!isSilentAnr()) {
int parentPid = pid;
if (parentProcess != null && parentProcess.getPid() > 0) {
parentPid = parentProcess.getPid();
}
if (parentPid != pid) firstPids.add(parentPid);
if (MY_PID != pid && MY_PID != parentPid) firstPids.add(MY_PID);
for (int i = getLruProcessList().size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
ProcessRecord r = getLruProcessList().get(i);
if (r != null && r.thread != null) {
int myPid = r.pid;
if (myPid > 0 && myPid != pid && myPid != parentPid && myPid != MY_PID) {
if (r.isPersistent()) {
firstPids.add(myPid);
if (DEBUG_ANR) Slog.i(TAG, "Adding persistent proc: " + r);
} else if (r.treatLikeActivity) {
firstPids.add(myPid);
if (DEBUG_ANR) Slog.i(TAG, "Adding likely IME: " + r);
} else {
lastPids.put(myPid, Boolean.TRUE);
if (DEBUG_ANR) Slog.i(TAG, "Adding ANR proc: " + r);
}
}
}
}
}
}
//开始组装logcat日志
// Log the ANR to the main log.
StringBuilder info = new StringBuilder();
info.setLength(0);
info.append("ANR in ").append(processName);
if (activityShortComponentName != null) {
info.append(" (").append(activityShortComponentName).append(")");
}
info.append("\n");
info.append("PID: ").append(pid).append("\n");
if (annotation != null) {
info.append("Reason: ").append(annotation).append("\n");
}
if (parentShortComponentName != null
&& parentShortComponentName.equals(activityShortComponentName)) {
info.append("Parent: ").append(parentShortComponentName).append("\n");
}
ProcessCpuTracker processCpuTracker = new ProcessCpuTracker(true);
//收集需要dump的native进程id
// don't dump native PIDs for background ANRs unless it is the process of interest
String[] nativeProcs = null;
if (isSilentAnr()) {
for (int i = 0; i < NATIVE_STACKS_OF_INTEREST.length; i++) {
if (NATIVE_STACKS_OF_INTEREST[i].equals(processName)) {
nativeProcs = new String[] {
processName };
break;
}
}
} else {
nativeProcs = NATIVE_STACKS_OF_INTEREST;
}
int[] pids = nativeProcs == null ? null : Process.getPidsForCommands(nativeProcs);
ArrayList<Integer> nativePids = null;
if (pids != null) {
nativePids = new ArrayList<>(pids.length);
for (int i : pids) {
nativePids.add(i);
}
}
//重点：开始dump堆栈
// For background ANRs, don't pass the ProcessCpuTracker to
// avoid spending 1/2 second collecting stats to rank lastPids.
File tracesFile = ActivityManagerService.dumpStackTraces(firstPids,
(isSilentAnr()) ? null : processCpuTracker, (isSilentAnr()) ? null : lastPids,
nativePids);
String cpuInfo = null;
if (isMonitorCpuUsage()) {
mService.updateCpuStatsNow();
synchronized (mService.mProcessCpuTracker) {
cpuInfo = mService.mProcessCpuTracker.printCurrentState(anrTime);
}
info.append(processCpuTracker.printCurrentLoad());
info.append(cpuInfo);
}
info.append(processCpuTracker.printCurrentState(anrTime));
//输出日志到Logcat
Slog.e(TAG, info.toString());
if (tracesFile == null) {
// There is no trace file, so dump (only) the alleged culprit's threads to the log
Process.sendSignal(pid, Process.SIGNAL_QUIT);
}
synchronized (mService) {
...
//后台进程直接杀死，不弹ANR
if (isSilentAnr() && !isDebugging()) {
kill("bg anr", true);
return;
}
//给app进程设置一个ANR状态
// Set the app's notResponding state, and look up the errorReportReceiver
makeAppNotRespondingLocked(activityShortComponentName,
annotation != null ? "ANR " + annotation : "ANR", info.toString());
// mUiHandler can be null if the AMS is constructed with injector only. This will only
// happen in tests.
//开始弹出ANR弹窗
if (mService.mUiHandler != null) {
// Bring up the infamous App Not Responding dialog
Message msg = Message.obtain();
msg.what = ActivityManagerService.SHOW_NOT_RESPONDING_UI_MSG;
msg.obj = new AppNotRespondingDialog.Data(this, aInfo, aboveSystem);
mService.mUiHandler.sendMessage(msg);
}
}
}
继续看下ActivityManagerService是如何dump堆栈的：
File tracesFile = ActivityManagerService.dumpStackTraces(firstPids,
(isSilentAnr()) ? null : processCpuTracker, (isSilentAnr()) ? null : lastPids,
nativePids);
ActivityManagerService.dumpStackTraces函数：
//com.android.server.am.ActivityManagerService
public static File dumpStackTraces(ArrayList<Integer> firstPids,
ProcessCpuTracker processCpuTracker, SparseArray<Boolean> lastPids,
ArrayList<Integer> nativePids) {
ArrayList<Integer> extraPids = null;
Slog.i(TAG, "dumpStackTraces pids=" + lastPids + " nativepids=" + nativePids);
// Measure CPU usage as soon as we're called in order to get a realistic sampling
// of the top users at the time of the request.
if (processCpuTracker != null) {
processCpuTracker.init();
try {
Thread.sleep(200);
} catch (InterruptedException ignored) {
}
processCpuTracker.update();
...
//创建ANR的输出文件：ANR_TRACE_DIR = "/data/anr";
final File tracesDir = new File(ANR_TRACE_DIR);
// Each set of ANR traces is written to a separate file and dumpstate will process
// all such files and add them to a captured bug report if they're recent enough.
maybePruneOldTraces(tracesDir);
// NOTE: We should consider creating the file in native code atomically once we've
// gotten rid of the old scheme of dumping and lot of the code that deals with paths
// can be removed.
File tracesFile = createAnrDumpFile(tracesDir);
if (tracesFile == null) {
return null;
}
//文件创建完毕，开始dump
dumpStackTraces(tracesFile.getAbsolutePath(), firstPids, nativePids, extraPids);
return tracesFile;
}
ActivityManagerService.dumpStackTraces:
//com.android.server.am.ActivityManagerService
public static void dumpStackTraces(String tracesFile, ArrayList<Integer> firstPids,
ArrayList<Integer> nativePids, ArrayList<Integer> extraPids) {
Slog.i(TAG, "Dumping to " + tracesFile);
// We don't need any sort of inotify based monitoring when we're dumping traces via
// tombstoned. Data is piped to an "intercept" FD installed in tombstoned so we're in full
// control of all writes to the file in question.
// We must complete all stack dumps within 20 seconds.
long remainingTime = 20 * 1000;
// First collect all of the stacks of the most important pids.
if (firstPids != null) {
int num = firstPids.size();
for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {
Slog.i(TAG, "Collecting stacks for pid " + firstPids.get(i));
final long timeTaken = dumpJavaTracesTombstoned(firstPids.get(i), tracesFile,
remainingTime);
remainingTime -= timeTaken;
if (remainingTime <= 0) {
Slog.e(TAG, "Aborting stack trace dump (current firstPid=" + firstPids.get(i) +
"); deadline exceeded.");
return;
}
if (DEBUG_ANR) {
Slog.d(TAG, "Done with pid " + firstPids.get(i) + " in " + timeTaken + "ms");
}
}
}
// Next collect the stacks of the native pids
if (nativePids != null) {
for (int pid : nativePids) {
Slog.i(TAG, "Collecting stacks for native pid " + pid);
final long nativeDumpTimeoutMs = Math.min(NATIVE_DUMP_TIMEOUT_MS, remainingTime);
final long start = SystemClock.elapsedRealtime();
Debug.dumpNativeBacktraceToFileTimeout(
pid, tracesFile, (int) (nativeDumpTimeoutMs / 1000));
final long timeTaken = SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - start;
remainingTime -= timeTaken;
if (remainingTime <= 0) {
Slog.e(TAG, "Aborting stack trace dump (current native pid=" + pid +
"); deadline exceeded.");
return;
}
if (DEBUG_ANR) {
Slog.d(TAG, "Done with native pid " + pid + " in " + timeTaken + "ms");
}
}
}
// Lastly, dump stacks for all extra PIDs from the CPU tracker.
if (extraPids != null) {
for (int pid : extraPids) {
Slog.i(TAG, "Collecting stacks for extra pid " + pid);
final long timeTaken = dumpJavaTracesTombstoned(pid, tracesFile, remainingTime);
remainingTime -= timeTaken;
if (remainingTime <= 0) {
Slog.e(TAG, "Aborting stack trace dump (current extra pid=" + pid +
"); deadline exceeded.");
return;
}
if (DEBUG_ANR) {
Slog.d(TAG, "Done with extra pid " + pid + " in " + timeTaken + "ms");
}
}
}
Slog.i(TAG, "Done dumping");
}
可见，dump trace用了两个函数：
dumpJavaTracesTombstoned和Debug.dumpNativeBacktraceToFileTimeout，分别是Java层和native层的。Native层是直接调用android.os.Debug类处理。Java层调用dumpJavaTracesTombstoned处理。先看下Java层。
ActivityManagerService.dumpJavaTracesTombstoned:
/**
* Dump java traces for process {@code pid} to the specified file. If java trace dumping
* fails, a native backtrace is attempted. Note that the timeout {@code timeoutMs} only applies
* to the java section of the trace, a further {@code NATIVE_DUMP_TIMEOUT_MS} might be spent
* attempting to obtain native traces in the case of a failure. Returns the total time spent
* capturing traces.
*/
private static long dumpJavaTracesTombstoned(int pid, String fileName, long timeoutMs) {
final long timeStart = SystemClock.elapsedRealtime();
boolean javaSuccess = Debug.dumpJavaBacktraceToFileTimeout(pid, fileName,
(int) (timeoutMs / 1000));
if (javaSuccess) {
// Check that something is in the file, actually. Try-catch should not be necessary,
// but better safe than sorry.
try {
long size = new File(fileName).length();
if (size < JAVA_DUMP_MINIMUM_SIZE) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Successfully created Java ANR file is empty!");
javaSuccess = false;
}
} catch (Exception e) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Unable to get ANR file size", e);
javaSuccess = false;
}
}
if (!javaSuccess) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Dumping Java threads failed, initiating native stack dump.");
if (!Debug.dumpNativeBacktraceToFileTimeout(pid, fileName,
(NATIVE_DUMP_TIMEOUT_MS / 1000))) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Native stack dump failed!");
}
}
return SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - timeStart;
}
又调用了 Debug.dumpJavaBacktraceToFileTimeout处理dump。
看下Debug类：
//android.os.Debug
/**
* Append the Java stack traces of a given native process to a specified file.
*
* @param pid pid to dump.
* @param file path of file to append dump to.
* @param timeoutSecs time to wait in seconds, or 0 to wait forever.
* @hide
*/
public static native boolean dumpJavaBacktraceToFileTimeout(int pid, String file,
int timeoutSecs);
/**
* Append the native stack traces of a given process to a specified file.
*
* @param pid pid to dump.
* @param file path of file to append dump to.
* @param timeoutSecs time to wait in seconds, or 0 to wait forever.
* @hide
*/
public static native boolean dumpNativeBacktraceToFileTimeout(int pid, String file,
int timeoutSecs);
所以Dump trace最终还是调用android.os.Debug类的这两个函数：
dumpJavaBacktraceToFileTimeout和dumpNativeBacktraceToFileTimeout。
这两个方法是native修饰的，因此需要去看下android源码。
注意这两个方法是加了@hide标记，app侧不能调用。
Native层如何dump trace
在Android源码中搜索dumpJavaBacktraceToFileTimeout这个函数对应的c++代码，找到了frameworks/base/core/jni/android_os_Debug.cpp，对应函数的实现：
frameworks/base/core/jni/android_os_Debug.cpp
static jboolean android_os_Debug_dumpJavaBacktraceToFileTimeout(JNIEnv* env, jobject clazz,
jint pid, jstring fileName, jint timeoutSecs) {
const bool ret = dumpTraces(env, pid, fileName, timeoutSecs, kDebuggerdJavaBacktrace);
return ret ? JNI_TRUE : JNI_FALSE;
}
跟踪到了system/core/debuggerd/client/debuggerd_client.cpp的 debuggerd_trigger_dump方法：
bool debuggerd_trigger_dump(pid_t tid, DebuggerdDumpType dump_type, unsigned int timeout_ms,
unique_fd output_fd) {
...
// Send the signal.
const int signal = (dump_type == kDebuggerdJavaBacktrace) ? SIGQUIT : BIONIC_SIGNAL_DEBUGGER;
sigval val = {
.sival_int = (dump_type == kDebuggerdNativeBacktrace) ? 1 : 0};
if (sigqueue(pid, signal, val) != 0) {
log_error(output_fd, errno, "failed to send signal to pid %d", pid);
return false;
}
...
}
这个函数里面会通过sigqueue函数(bionic/libc/bionic/signal.cpp)给目标进程发送一个SIGQUIT信号。
继续看接收SIGQUIT信号的地方。
每一个app进程都会有一个SignalCatcher线程，专门处理SIGQUIT信号，来到art/runtime/signal_catcher.cc:
void* SignalCatcher::Run(void* arg) {
SignalCatcher* signal_catcher = reinterpret_cast<SignalCatcher*>(arg);
...
// Set up mask with signals we want to handle.
SignalSet signals;
signals.Add(SIGQUIT);
signals.Add(SIGUSR1);
while (true) {
int signal_number = signal_catcher->WaitForSignal(self, signals);
if (signal_catcher->ShouldHalt()) {
runtime->DetachCurrentThread();
return nullptr;
}
switch (signal_number) {
case SIGQUIT:
signal_catcher->HandleSigQuit();
break;
case SIGUSR1:
signal_catcher->HandleSigUsr1();
break;
default:
LOG(ERROR) << "Unexpected signal %d" << signal_number;
break;
}
}
}
监听到SIGQUIT信号后交给了HandleSigQuit函数处理：
void SignalCatcher::HandleSigQuit() {
Runtime* runtime = Runtime::Current();
std::ostringstream os;
os << "\n"
<< "----- pid " << getpid() << " at " << GetIsoDate() << " -----\n";
DumpCmdLine(os);
// Note: The strings "Build fingerprint:" and "ABI:" are chosen to match the format used by
// debuggerd. This allows, for example, the stack tool to work.
std::string fingerprint = runtime->GetFingerprint();
os << "Build fingerprint: '" << (fingerprint.empty() ? "unknown" : fingerprint) << "'\n";
os << "ABI: '" << GetInstructionSetString(runtime->GetInstructionSet()) << "'\n";
os << "Build type: " << (kIsDebugBuild ? "debug" : "optimized") << "\n";
runtime->DumpForSigQuit(os);
if ((false)) {
std::string maps;
if (android::base::ReadFileToString("/proc/self/maps", &maps)) {
os << "/proc/self/maps:\n" << maps;
}
}
os << "----- end " << getpid() << " -----\n";
Output(os.str());
}
中间调用art/runtime/runtime.cc的DumpForSigQuit方法收集了更多详细的信息，包括线程堆栈。
void Runtime::DumpForSigQuit(std::ostream& os) {
// Print backtraces first since they are important do diagnose ANRs,
// and ANRs can often be trimmed to limit upload size.
thread_list_->DumpForSigQuit(os);
GetClassLinker()->DumpForSigQuit(os);
GetInternTable()->DumpForSigQuit(os);
GetJavaVM()->DumpForSigQuit(os);
GetHeap()->DumpForSigQuit(os);
oat_file_manager_->DumpForSigQuit(os);
if (GetJit() != nullptr) {
GetJit()->DumpForSigQuit(os);
} else {
os << "Running non JIT\n";
}
DumpDeoptimizations(os);
TrackedAllocators::Dump(os);
GetMetrics()->DumpForSigQuit(os);
os << "\n";
BaseMutex::DumpAll(os);
// Inform anyone else who is interested in SigQuit.
{
ScopedObjectAccess soa(Thread::Current());
callbacks_->SigQuit();
}
}
ANR打印的信息比较多，详细请参阅相关源码。
到这里已经分析完了整个ANR从发生到打印的流程。
ANR分析方法
现在已经知道了ANR是怎么回事了，现在看下发生了ANR是如何定位原因的。
上文已经讲到发生ANR会在两个地方打印日志，一个是在Logcat里打印，一个是在/data/anr/目录下的trace文件里打印。
下面模拟两个场景复现ANR，一个场景是耗时操作导致ANR，一个是死锁导致ANR。
场景1：耗时操作导致ANR
为了方便，就让主线程休眠10s。
在Activity界面上有一个按钮，点击会让主线程休眠10s，代码如下，显然会发生ANR。
class AnrTestActivity : AppCompatActivity() {
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContentView(R.layout.activity_anr_test)
this.findViewById<Button>(R.id.button).setOnClickListener{
SystemClock.sleep(10000)
}
}
连续点击两次，5s之后会弹出ANR弹窗。
Logcat输出日志如下：
2022-10-02 15:38:00.505 594-5381/system_process E/ActivityManager: ANR in com.devnn.demo (com.devnn.demo/.AnrTestActivity)
PID: 5232
Reason: Input dispatching timed out (f99e8bb com.devnn.demo/com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity (server) is not responding. Waited 5008ms for MotionEvent(deviceId=8, source=0x00005002, displayId=0, action=DOWN, actionButton=0x00000000, flags=0x00000000, metaState=0x00000000, buttonState=0x00000000, classification=NONE, edgeFlags=0x00000000, xPrecision=22.8, yPrecision=12.8, xCursorPosition=nan, yCursorPosition=nan, pointers=[0: (804.9, 1173.9)]), policyFlags=0x62000000)
Parent: com.devnn.demo/.AnrTestActivity
Load: 0.05 / 0.01 / 0.0
----- Output from /proc/pressure/memory -----
some avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=0
full avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=0
----- End output from /proc/pressure/memory -----
CPU usage from 158257ms to 0ms ago (2022-10-02 15:35:18.256 to 2022-10-02 15:37:56.513):
6.2% 279/[email protected]: 0.3% user + 5.9% kernel
2.2% 292/[email protected]: 0% user + 2.1% kernel
1.6% 594/system_server: 0.3% user + 1.3% kernel / faults: 1085 minor
1.4% 300/[email protected]: 0% user + 1.4% kernel
0.4% 277/android.hardware.audio.service.ranchu: 0% user + 0.4% kernel / faults: 10 minor
0.2% 371/audioserver: 0% user + 0.2% kernel / faults: 4 minor
0.2% 5232/com.devnn.demo: 0% user + 0.2% kernel / faults: 272 minor
0.2% 318/surfaceflinger: 0% user + 0.2% kernel
0% 16/ksoftirqd/1: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 365/adbd: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 477/llkd: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 872/[email protected]: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 10/rcu_preempt: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 2014/com.android.systemui: 0% user + 0% kernel / faults: 39 minor
0% 9/ksoftirqd/0: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 1002/com.android.phone: 0% user + 0% kernel / faults: 100 minor
0% 3645/kworker/0:2-events_power_efficient: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 157/logd: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 427/libgoldfish-rild: 0% user + 0% kernel / faults: 16 minor
0% 3270/kworker/1:1-mm_percpu_wq: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 159/servicemanager: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 160/hwservicemanager: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 478/hostapd_nohidl: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 5346/kworker/u4:0-events_unbound: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 11/migration/0: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 15/migration/1: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 164/qemu-props: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 188/jbd2/dm-5-8: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 269/statsd: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 342/logcat: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 418/media.metrics: 0% user + 0% kernel / faults: 1 minor
0% 442/[email protected]: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 761/wpa_supplicant: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 3615/logcat: 0% user + 0% kernel
0% 5068/kworker/u4:1-phy0: 0% user + 0% kernel
1.9% TOTAL: 0.1% user + 1.7% kernel + 0% softirq
CPU usage from 20ms to 335ms later (2022-10-02 15:37:56.533 to 2022-10-02 15:37:56.848):
22% 594/system_server: 15% user + 7.5% kernel / faults: 161 minor
22% 5381/AnrConsumer: 7.5% user + 15% kernel
6.9% 279/[email protected]: 0% user + 6.9% kernel
6.9% 1215/[email protected]: 0% user + 6.9% kernel
3.5% 292/[email protected]: 0% user + 3.5% kernel
18% TOTAL: 8.6% user + 10% kernel
注意需要选中system_process进程。
从Logcat日志可以看出来，是进程id=5323的处理输入事件超时了。这个日志也是上文分析的ProcessRecord.appNotResponding方法打印出来的。
下面看下/data/anr/目录下的日志内容是怎么样的。
整个trace文件就代表发生一次ANR的日志。每发生一次ANR就会生成新的trace文件，trace文件名称以时间命名的。
整个trace文件是有结构的，它整体上是以进程为单位进行打印的。
由于发生ANR不一定是app进程导致的，可能是其它关联进程导致的，所以它把相关进程的信息都打印在同一个文件里了。基本上是以下面这个结构打印的。
----- pid 5232 at 2022-10-02 15:37:56 -----
进程5232的详细日志
----- end 5232 -----
----- pid 594 at 2022-10-02 15:37:57 -----
进程594的详细日志
----- end 594 -----
----- pid xxx at xxxx-xx-xx xx:xx:xx -----
进程xxx的详细日志
----- end xxx -----
第一个进程就是发生ANR的进程，一般是app进程。
由于内容过长，整个trace文件有700多KB，下面就截取app进程的主要信息。
每个进程信息的开头是它的概要信息，包括进程id，发生ANR的时间，进程的名称。
----- pid 5232 at 2022-10-02 15:37:56 -----
Cmd line: com.devnn.demo
Build fingerprint: 'Android/sdk_phone_x86_64/generic_x86_64:11/RSR1.210722.012/7758210:userdebug/test-keys'
ABI: 'x86_64'
Build type: optimized
Zygote loaded classes=15740 post zygote classes=1289
Dumping registered class loaders
#0 dalvik.system.PathClassLoader: [], parent #1
#1 java.lang.BootClassLoader: [], no parent
#2 dalvik.system.PathClassLoader: [/data/app/~~Qnj80NrB3yjtX87JepktGQ==/com.devnn.demo-FWP2tIJA7Ec1qoJefwnc0A==/base.apk:/data/app/~~Qnj80NrB3yjtX87JepktGQ==/com.devnn.demo-FWP2tIJA7Ec1qoJefwnc0A==/base.apk!classes10.dex:/data/app/~~Qnj80NrB3yjtX87JepktGQ==/com.devnn.demo-FWP2tIJA7Ec1qoJefwnc0A==/base.apk!classes11.dex:/data/app/~~Qnj80NrB3yjtX87JepktGQ==/com.devnn.demo-FWP2tIJA7Ec1qoJefwnc0A==/base.apk!classes6.dex:/data/app/~~Qnj80NrB3yjtX87JepktGQ==/com.devnn.demo-FWP2tIJA7Ec1qoJefwnc0A==/base.apk!classes2.dex:/data/app/~~Qnj80NrB3yjtX87JepktGQ==/com.devnn.demo-FWP2tIJA7Ec1qoJefwnc0A==/base.apk!classes3.dex:/data/app/~~Qnj80NrB3yjtX87JepktGQ==/com.devnn.demo-FWP2tIJA7Ec1qoJefwnc0A==/base.apk!classes8.dex], parent #1
Done dumping class loaders
Classes initialized: 526 in 694.025ms
Intern table: 31792 strong; 523 weak
JNI: CheckJNI is on; globals=639 (plus 37 weak)
Libraries: libandroid.so libaudioeffect_jni.so libcompiler_rt.so libicu_jni.so libjavacore.so libjavacrypto.so libjnigraphics.so libmedia_jni.so libopenjdk.so librs_jni.so libsfplugin_ccodec.so libsoundpool.so libstats_jni.so libwebviewchromium_loader.so (14)
Heap: 46% free, 11MB/21MB; 75810 objects
//此处省略部分内容
第二部分是进程里所有线程的状态、堆栈，也是我们重点要关注的：
suspend all histogram: Sum: 74.854ms 99% C.I. 0.005ms-43.315ms Avg: 3.742ms Max: 44.394ms
DALVIK THREADS (21):
"Signal Catcher" daemon prio=10 tid=4 Runnable
| group="system" sCount=0 dsCount=0 flags=0 obj=0x12c40b10 self=0x7fada5a4af50
| sysTid=5242 nice=-20 cgrp=top-app sched=0/0 handle=0x7fac275adcf0
| state=R schedstat=( 21716542 2041235 2 ) utm=0 stm=2 core=0 HZ=100
| stack=0x7fac274b6000-0x7fac274b8000 stackSize=995KB
| held mutexes= "mutator lock"(shared held)
native: #00 pc 000000000054da9e /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::DumpNativeStack(std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >&, int, BacktraceMap*, char const*, art::ArtMethod*, void*, bool)+126)
native: #01 pc 000000000069615c /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::Thread::DumpStack(std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >&, bool, BacktraceMap*, bool) const+380)
native: #02 pc 00000000006b7320 /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::DumpCheckpoint::Run(art::Thread*)+1088)
native: #03 pc 00000000006b064d /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::ThreadList::RunCheckpoint(art::Closure*, art::Closure*)+557)
native: #04 pc 00000000006af729 /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::ThreadList::Dump(std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >&, bool)+1817)
native: #05 pc 00000000006aec28 /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::ThreadList::DumpForSigQuit(std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >&)+824)
native: #06 pc 00000000006470d9 /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::Runtime::DumpForSigQuit(std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >&)+201)
native: #07 pc 000000000065ceb6 /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::SignalCatcher::HandleSigQuit()+1766)
native: #08 pc 000000000065bc85 /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libart.so (art::SignalCatcher::Run(void*)+357)
native: #09 pc 00000000000c7d2a /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/bionic/libc.so (__pthread_start(void*)+58)
native: #10 pc 000000000005f0c7 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/bionic/libc.so (__start_thread+55)
(no managed stack frames)
"main" prio=5 tid=1 Sleeping
| group="main" sCount=1 dsCount=0 flags=1 obj=0x71fb36a8 self=0x7fada5a477b0
| sysTid=5232 nice=-10 cgrp=top-app sched=0/0 handle=0x7faecb97d4f8
| state=S schedstat=( 5775317077 4230577099 871 ) utm=286 stm=291 core=0 HZ=100
| stack=0x7ffc29566000-0x7ffc29568000 stackSize=8192KB
| held mutexes=
at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native method)
- sleeping on <0x06059c02> (a java.lang.Object)
at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Thread.java:442)
- locked <0x06059c02> (a java.lang.Object)
at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Thread.java:358)
at android.os.SystemClock.sleep(SystemClock.java:131)
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.onCreate$lambda-0(AnrTestActivity.kt:17)
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.lambda$UpadNwrDNzrVyNaTI0ysWoH569M(AnrTestActivity.kt:-1)
at com.devnn.demo.-$$Lambda$AnrTestActivity$UpadNwrDNzrVyNaTI0ysWoH569M.onClick(lambda:-1)
at android.view.View.performClick(View.java:7448)
at android.view.View.performClickInternal(View.java:7425)
at android.view.View.access$3600(View.java:810)
at android.view.View$PerformClick.run(View.java:28305)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:938)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:223)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:7656)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native method)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:592)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:947)
"perfetto_hprof_listener" prio=10 tid=5 Native (still starting up)
| group="" sCount=1 dsCount=0 flags=1 obj=0x0 self=0x7fada5a4cb20
| sysTid=5243 nice=-20 cgrp=top-app sched=0/0 handle=0x7fac274afcf0
| state=S schedstat=( 3314219 3983561 6 ) utm=0 stm=0 core=0 HZ=100
| stack=0x7fac273b8000-0x7fac273ba000 stackSize=995KB
| held mutexes=
native: #00 pc 00000000000b1ec5 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/bionic/libc.so (read+5)
native: #01 pc 000000000001cb70 /apex/com.android.art/lib64/libperfetto_hprof.so (void* std::__1::__thread_proxy<std::__1::tuple<std::__1::unique_ptr<std::__1::__thread_struct, std::__1::default_delete<std::__1::__thread_struct> >, ArtPlugin_Initialize::$_29> >(void*)+288)
native: #02 pc 00000000000c7d2a /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/bionic/libc.so (__pthread_start(void*)+58)
native: #03 pc 000000000005f0c7 /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/bionic/libc.so (__start_thread+55)
(no managed stack frames)
//...省略其它线程
可以看到第一个线程是Signal Catcher守护线程，用来捕获SIGQUIT信号的。从这里也说明这个线程是属于app进程的。第二个线程就是我们app的主线程：
"main" prio=5 tid=1 Sleeping
| group="main" sCount=1 dsCount=0 flags=1 obj=0x71fb36a8 self=0x7fada5a477b0
| sysTid=5232 nice=-10 cgrp=top-app sched=0/0 handle=0x7faecb97d4f8
| state=S schedstat=( 5775317077 4230577099 871 ) utm=286 stm=291 core=0 HZ=100
| stack=0x7ffc29566000-0x7ffc29568000 stackSize=8192KB
| held mutexes=
at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native method)
- sleeping on <0x06059c02> (a java.lang.Object)
at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Thread.java:442)
- locked <0x06059c02> (a java.lang.Object)
at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Thread.java:358)
at android.os.SystemClock.sleep(SystemClock.java:131)
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.onCreate$lambda-0(AnrTestActivity.kt:17)
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.lambda$UpadNwrDNzrVyNaTI0ysWoH569M(AnrTestActivity.kt:-1)
at com.devnn.demo.-$$Lambda$AnrTestActivity$UpadNwrDNzrVyNaTI0ysWoH569M.onClick(lambda:-1)
at android.view.View.performClick(View.java:7448)
at android.view.View.performClickInternal(View.java:7425)
可以看到主线程由于正在休眠而无法响应输入事件。
每个线程信息的第一行是固定的：
"main" prio=5 tid=1 Sleeping
第一个表示线程名称，第二个是它的优先级，第三个是线程id，第四个是线程状态。
这里有个关键信息就是线程状态，一般看这个线程状态就大概知道是什么原因导致的ANR。这里一看是休眠了，所以后面看它的堆栈就能分析具体的代码位置。
下面再看一个死锁操作导致ANR的例子。
场景2：死锁导致ANR
private fun clickTest() {
val obj1 = Object()
val obj2 = Object()
Thread {
synchronized(obj1) {
Thread.sleep(100)
//子线程已经获取obj1的锁，想要获取ojb2的锁
synchronized(obj2) {
Log.i("AnrTest", "sub")
}
}
}.start()
synchronized(obj2) {
Thread.sleep(100)
//子线程已经获取obj2的锁，想要获取ojb1的锁
synchronized(obj1) {
Log.i("AnrTest", "main")
}
}
}
Logcat日志如下，依然显示无法响应输入事件。
2022-10-02 16:30:14.001 594-5956/system_process E/ActivityManager: ANR in com.devnn.demo (com.devnn.demo/.AnrTestActivity)
PID: 5906
Reason: Input dispatching timed out (1313584 com.devnn.demo/com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity (server) is not responding. Waited 5007ms for MotionEvent(deviceId=8, source=0x00005002, displayId=0, action=DOWN, actionButton=0x00000000, flags=0x00000000, metaState=0x00000000, buttonState=0x00000000, classification=NONE, edgeFlags=0x00000000, xPrecision=22.8, yPrecision=12.8, xCursorPosition=nan, yCursorPosition=nan, pointers=[0: (721.0, 1641.9)]), policyFlags=0x62000000)
Parent: com.devnn.demo/.AnrTestActivity
Load: 0.8 / 0.67 / 0.39
----- Output from /proc/pressure/memory -----
some avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=0
full avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=0
----- End output from /proc/pressure/memory -----
CPU usage from 285508ms to 0ms ago (2022-10-02 16:25:25.779 to 2022-10-02 16:30:11.287):
8.1% 279/[email protected]: 0.6% user + 7.4% kernel
4.4% 292/[email protected]: 0.3% user + 4.1% kernel
4.3% 594/system_server: 1.4% user + 2.8% kernel / faults: 19536 minor
2.8% 318/surfaceflinger: 0.3% user + 2.4% kernel / faults: 871 minor
2% 300/[email protected]: 0% user + 1.9% kernel
0.5% 2014/com.android.systemui: 0% user + 0.5% kernel / faults: 4342 minor
0.4% 365/adbd: 0% user + 0.4% kernel / faults: 946 minor
0.2% 1152/com.android.launcher3: 0% user + 0.2% kernel / faults: 50 minor
0.2% 157/logd: 0% user + 0.2% kernel / faults: 13 minor
0.2% 277/android.hardware.audio.service.ranchu: 0% user + 0.1% kernel / faults: 5 minor
0.2% 10/rcu_preempt: 0% user + 0.2% kernel
0.1% 1002/com.android.phone: 0% user + 0% kernel / faults: 1267 minor
Logat里看不出具体原因，所以要看trace文件。
----- pid 5906 at 2022-10-02 16:30:11 -----
Cmd line: com.devnn.demo
Build fingerprint: 'Android/sdk_phone_x86_64/generic_x86_64:11/RSR1.210722.012/7758210:userdebug/test-keys'
ABI: 'x86_64'
Build type: optimized
...省略无关内容
"main" prio=5 tid=1 Blocked
| group="main" sCount=1 dsCount=0 flags=1 obj=0x71fb36a8 self=0x7fada5a477b0
| sysTid=5906 nice=-10 cgrp=top-app sched=0/0 handle=0x7faecb97d4f8
| state=S schedstat=( 2792813804 2053378730 782 ) utm=161 stm=117 core=0 HZ=100
| stack=0x7ffc29566000-0x7ffc29568000 stackSize=8192KB
| held mutexes=
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.clickTest(AnrTestActivity.kt:48)
- waiting to lock <0x026f6b14> (a java.lang.Object) held by thread 2
- locked <0x0188dfbd> (a java.lang.Object)
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.onCreate$lambda-1(AnrTestActivity.kt:21)
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.lambda$W1-GSjdjbC-dtyUoueoTRdjL4Es(AnrTestActivity.kt:-1)
at com.devnn.demo.-$$Lambda$AnrTestActivity$W1-GSjdjbC-dtyUoueoTRdjL4Es.onClick(lambda:-1)
at android.view.View.performClick(View.java:7448)
at android.view.View.performClickInternal(View.java:7425)
at android.view.View.access$3600(View.java:810)
at android.view.View$PerformClick.run(View.java:28305)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:938)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:223)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:7656)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native method)
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:592)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:947)
可以看到主线程状态是Bocked(阻塞)。
waiting to lock <0x026f6b14> (a java.lang.Object) held by thread 2
- locked <0x0188dfbd> (a java.lang.Object)
堆栈显示主线程正在获取0x026f6b14这个对象的锁，这个锁被线程2持有。同时主线程正在持有0x0188dfbd对象锁。
然后看线程2的堆栈：
"Thread-5" prio=5 tid=2 Blocked
| group="main" sCount=1 dsCount=0 flags=1 obj=0x12db7fc0 self=0x7fada5a55630
| sysTid=5953 nice=0 cgrp=top-app sched=0/0 handle=0x7fabdc49fcf0
| state=S schedstat=( 1560220 17477159 3 ) utm=0 stm=0 core=0 HZ=100
| stack=0x7fabdc39c000-0x7fabdc39e000 stackSize=1043KB
| held mutexes=
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.clickTest$lambda-4(AnrTestActivity.kt:39)
- waiting to lock <0x0188dfbd> (a java.lang.Object) held by thread 1
- locked <0x026f6b14> (a java.lang.Object)
at com.devnn.demo.AnrTestActivity.lambda$A4lEoLZVf4n-xUBZSqj2v3ihIqw(AnrTestActivity.kt:-1)
at com.devnn.demo.-$$Lambda$AnrTestActivity$A4lEoLZVf4n-xUBZSqj2v3ihIqw.run(lambda:-1)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:923)
线程2也处于Blocked状态，而它正在等待0x0188dfbd这个对象的锁， 这个锁正在被线程1持有。而线程2正在持有0x026f6b14这个对象锁。
这就是死锁导致的ANR。
trace文件中的线程状态
在查看trace文件中的线程状态时，可以看到线程有很多状态：
"Signal Catcher" daemon prio=10 tid=4 Runnable
"RenderThread" daemon prio=7 tid=21 Native
"DefaultDispatcher-worker-1" daemon prio=5 tid=22 TimedWaiting
"main" prio=5 tid=1 Blocked
"main" prio=5 tid=1 Sleeping
"main" prio=5 tid=1 MONITOR
主要有这几种状态，有几个状态是在Thread类已经定义了，但是Native和MONITOR是什么状态呢?
回顾下Thread类中定义的几种线程状态：
//java.lang.Thread
public class Thread implements Runnable {
public enum State {
/**
* Thread state for a thread which has not yet started.
*/
NEW,
/**
* Thread state for a runnable thread. A thread in the runnable
* state is executing in the Java virtual machine but it may
* be waiting for other resources from the operating system
* such as processor.
*/
RUNNABLE,
/**
* Thread state for a thread blocked waiting for a monitor lock.
* A thread in the blocked state is waiting for a monitor lock
* to enter a synchronized block/method or
* reenter a synchronized block/method after calling
* {@link Object#wait() Object.wait}.
*/
BLOCKED,
/**
* Thread state for a waiting thread.
* A thread is in the waiting state due to calling one of the
* following methods:
* <ul>
* <li>{@link Object#wait() Object.wait} with no timeout</li>
* <li>{@link #join() Thread.join} with no timeout</li>
* <li>{@link LockSupport#park() LockSupport.park}</li>
* </ul>
*
* <p>A thread in the waiting state is waiting for another thread to
* perform a particular action.
*
* For example, a thread that has called <tt>Object.wait()</tt>
* on an object is waiting for another thread to call
* <tt>Object.notify()</tt> or <tt>Object.notifyAll()</tt> on
* that object. A thread that has called <tt>Thread.join()</tt>
* is waiting for a specified thread to terminate.
*/
WAITING,
/**
* Thread state for a waiting thread with a specified waiting time.
* A thread is in the timed waiting state due to calling one of
* the following methods with a specified positive waiting time:
* <ul>
* <li>{@link #sleep Thread.sleep}</li>
* <li>{@link Object#wait(long) Object.wait} with timeout</li>
* <li>{@link #join(long) Thread.join} with timeout</li>
* <li>{@link LockSupport#parkNanos LockSupport.parkNanos}</li>
* <li>{@link LockSupport#parkUntil LockSupport.parkUntil}</li>
* </ul>
*/
TIMED_WAITING,
/**
* Thread state for a terminated thread.
* The thread has completed execution.
*/
TERMINATED;
}
}
在VMThread中有它们的对应关系：
//VMThread.java
/**
* Holds a mapping from native Thread statuses to Java one. Required for
* translating back the result of getStatus().
*/
static final Thread.State[] STATE_MAP = new Thread.State[] {
Thread.State.TERMINATED, // ZOMBIE
Thread.State.RUNNABLE, // RUNNING
Thread.State.TIMED_WAITING, // TIMED_WAIT
Thread.State.BLOCKED, // MONITOR
Thread.State.WAITING, // WAIT
Thread.State.NEW, // INITIALIZING
Thread.State.NEW, // STARTING
Thread.State.RUNNABLE, // NATIVE
Thread.State.WAITING, // VMWAIT
Thread.State.RUNNABLE // SUSPENDED
};
可见NATIVE就代表RUNNABLE，MONITOR就代表BLOCKED。
OK，关于ANR问题产生过程与分析方法就介绍到这儿了。