RxJava1.X升级到RxJava2.X笔记

版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,未经博主允许不得转载。 https://blog.csdn.net/a125138/article/details/53084325

简书地址 http://www.jianshu.com/p/2badfbb3a33b

描述 RxJava 1.X RxJava 2.X
package包名 rx.xxx io.reactivex.xxx
Reactive Streams规范 1.X早于Reactive Streams规范出现,仅部分支持规范 完全支持
Backpressure 背压 对背压的支持不完善 Observable设计为不支持背压
新增Flowable支持背压
null空值 支持 不再支持null值,传入null值会抛出 NullPointerException
Schedulers线程调度器 Schedulers.immediate()
Schedulers.trampoline()
Schedulers.computation()
Schedulers.newThread()
Schedulers.io()
Schedulers.from(executor)
AndroidSchedulers.mainThread()
移除Schedulers.immediate()
新增Schedulers.single()
其它未变
Single 行为类似Observable,但只会发射一个onSuccessonError 按照Reactive Streams规范重新设计,遵循协议onSubscribe(onSuccess/onError)
Completable 行为类似Observable,要么全部成功,要么就失败 按照Reactive Streams规范重新设计,遵循协议onSubscribe (onComplete/onError)
Maybe 2.X新增,行为类似Observable,可能会有一个数据或一个错误,也可能什么都没有。可以将其视为一种返回可空值的方法。这种方法如果不抛出异常的话,将总是会返回一些东西,但是返回值可能为空,也可能不为空。按照Reactive Streams规范设计,遵循协议onSubscribe (onSuccess/onError/onComplete)
Flowable 2.X新增,行为类似Observable,按照Reactive Streams规范设计,支持背压Backpressure
Subject AsyncSubject
BehaviorSubject
PublishSubject
ReplaySubject
UnicastSubject
2.X依然维护这些Subject现有的功能,并新增:
AsyncProcessor
BehaviorProcessor
PublishProcessor
ReplayProcessor
UnicastProcessor
支持背压Backpressure
Subscriber Subscriber 由于与Reactive Streams的命名冲突,Subscriber已重命名为Disposable

RxJava 2.X + Retrofit + OkHttp 简单示例点这里

library依赖变化

//1.X
compile 'io.reactivex:rxjava:1.2.1'
compile 'io.reactivex:rxandroid:1.2.1'

//2.X
compile 'io.reactivex.rxjava2:rxjava:2.0.0'
compile 'io.reactivex.rxjava2:rxandroid:2.0.0'

package变化

变动主要为rx.xxx --> io.reactivex.xxx

//1.X
import rx.Observable;
import rx.Subscription;
import rx.android.schedulers.AndroidSchedulers;
import rx.schedulers.Schedulers;
import rx.functions.Action1;

//2.X
import io.reactivex.Observable;
import io.reactivex.ObservableSource;
import io.reactivex.ObservableTransformer;
import io.reactivex.disposables.Disposable;
import io.reactivex.android.schedulers.AndroidSchedulers;
import io.reactivex.schedulers.Schedulers;
import io.reactivex.functions.Consumer;

null

RxJava 2.X不再支持null值,如果传入一个null会抛出NullPointerException

Observable.just(null);

Single.just(null);

Observable.fromCallable(() -> null)
    .subscribe(System.out::println, Throwable::printStackTrace);

Observable.just(1).map(v -> null)
    .subscribe(System.out::println, Throwable::printStackTrace);

案例1

//1.X
public static final Observable.Transformer IO_TRANSFORMER = new Observable.Transformer() {
    @Override public Object call(Object observable) {
        return ((Observable) observable).subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
                                        .unsubscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
                                        .observeOn(Schedulers.io());
    }
};
public static final <T> Observable.Transformer<T, T> applySchedulers(Observable.Transformer transformer){
    return (Observable.Transformer<T, T>)transformer;
}
Action1<Integer> onNext = null;
String[] items = { "item1", "item2", "item3" };
Subscription subscription = Observable.from(items)
                                      .compose(RxUtil.<String>applySchedulers(IO_TRANSFORMER))
                                      .map(new Func1<String, Integer>() {
                                                  @Override public Integer call(String s) {
                                                      return Integer.valueOf(s);
                                                  }
                                              })
                                      .subscribe(onNext);
//TODO subscription.unsubscribe();   

//2.X
public static final ObservableTransformer IO_TRANSFORMER = new ObservableTransformer() {
    @Override public ObservableSource apply(Observable upstream) {
        return upstream.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
                       .unsubscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
                       .observeOn(Schedulers.io());
    }
};
public static final <T> ObservableTransformer<T, T> applySchedulers(ObservableTransformer transformer){
    return (ObservableTransformer<T, T>)transformer;
}
Consumer<Integer> onNext = null;
String[] items = { "item1", "item2", "item3" };
Disposable disposable = Observable.fromArray(items)
                                  .compose(RxUtil.<String>applySchedulers(IO_TRANSFORMER))
                                  .map(new Function<String, Integer>() {
                                              @Override public Integer apply(String s) throws Exception {
                                                  return Integer.valueOf(s);
                                              }
                                          })
                                  .subscribe(onNext);
//TODO disposable.dispose();
  • .subscribe(...)返回值的变化:1.X为Subscription, 2.X为Disposable
  • Transformer的变化:1.X为rx.Observable内部的Transformer接口, 继承自Func1<Observable<T>, Observable<R>>, 2.X为io.reactivexObservableTransformer<Upstream, Downstream>,是一个独立的接口
  • AndroidSchedulers的变化: 1.X为rx.android.schedulers.AndroidSchedulers, 2.X为io.reactivex.android.schedulers.AndroidSchedulers
  • Func1的变化: 1.X为rx.functions.Func1, 2.X为io.reactivex.functions.Function
  • 其它重载方法见下方截图
    1.X
    2.X

案例2

//1.X
public class AppBaseActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
    ...
    private CompositeSubscription mCompositeSubscription;

    protected void addSubscription(Subscription subscription) {
        if (null == mCompositeSubscription) {
            mCompositeSubscription = new CompositeSubscription();
        }
        mCompositeSubscription.add(subscription);
    }

    @Override protected void onDestroy() {
        if (null != mCompositeSubscription) {
            mCompositeSubscription.unsubscribe();
        }
        super.onDestroy();
    }
    ...
}

//2.X
public class AppBaseActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
    ...
    private   CompositeDisposable mCompositeDisposable;

    protected void addDisposable(Disposable disposable) {
        if (null == mCompositeDisposable) {
            mCompositeDisposable = new CompositeDisposable();
        }
        mCompositeDisposable.add(disposable);
    }

    @Override protected void onDestroy() {
        if (null != mCompositeDisposable) {
            mCompositeDisposable.clear();
        }
        super.onDestroy();
    }
    ...
}

我现在维护的项目基本就这些改动,如有错误之处,还望批评指正,谢谢!

猜你喜欢

转载自blog.csdn.net/a125138/article/details/53084325