Android 的view树结构大家都清楚，但是事件序列是经过一个怎样的处理路径那。今天就带着疑问来看看源码，去寻找答案。
首先我们先看事件如何从Activity开始分发。
public class Activity extends ContextThemeWrapper
implements LayoutInflater.Factory2,
Window.Callback, KeyEvent.Callback,
OnCreateContextMenuListener, ComponentCallbacks2,
Window.OnWindowDismissedCallback, WindowControllerCallback,
AutofillManager.AutofillClient {
private static final String TAG = "Activity";
private static final boolean DEBUG_LIFECYCLE = false;
/** Standard activity result: operation canceled. */
public static final int RESULT_CANCELED = 0;
/** Standard activity result: operation succeeded. */
public static final int RESULT_OK = -1;
/** Start of user-defined activity results. */
public static final int RESULT_FIRST_USER = 1;
......
我们注意到Activity 实现的接口中，Window.Callback这个。
public interface Callback {
public boolean dispatchKeyEvent(KeyEvent event);
public boolean dispatchKeyShortcutEvent(KeyEvent event);
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event);
public boolean dispatchTrackballEvent(MotionEvent event);
public boolean dispatchGenericMotionEvent(MotionEvent event);
public boolean dispatchPopulateAccessibilityEvent(AccessibilityEvent event);
@Nullable
public View onCreatePanelView(int featureId);
public boolean onCreatePanelMenu(int featureId, Menu menu);
public boolean onPreparePanel(int featureId, View view, Menu menu);
public boolean onMenuOpened(int featureId, Menu menu);
public boolean onMenuItemSelected(int featureId, MenuItem item);
public void onWindowAttributesChanged(WindowManager.LayoutParams attrs);
public void onContentChanged();
public void onWindowFocusChanged(boolean hasFocus);
public void onAttachedToWindow();
public void onDetachedFromWindow();
public void onPanelClosed(int featureId, Menu menu);
public boolean onSearchRequested();
public boolean onSearchRequested(SearchEvent searchEvent);
@Nullable
public ActionMode onWindowStartingActionMode(ActionMode.Callback callback);
@Nullable
public ActionMode onWindowStartingActionMode(ActionMode.Callback callback, int type);
public void onActionModeStarted(ActionMode mode);
public void onActionModeFinished(ActionMode mode);
default public void onProvideKeyboardShortcuts(
List<KeyboardShortcutGroup> data, @Nullable Menu menu, int deviceId) { };
default public void onPointerCaptureChanged(boolean hasCapture) { };
}
Callback是window的内部接口类。可以看出方法还是特别多，我们只关注
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event);
下面来看看Activity如何实现这个方法
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
if (ev.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
onUserInteraction();
}
if (getWindow().superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)) {
return true;
}
return onTouchEvent(ev);
}
首先判断如果是 ACTION_DOWN事件，就调用一个onUserInteraction方法，这个方法是需要APP程序员自己覆写的，完成自己的业务需求。
接下来是getWindow().superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)。这个方法如果返回true，即消费了事件，那不会调用后面activity自己的onTouchEvent(ev)。activity自己怎么消费这个事件那？
public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
if (mWindow.shouldCloseOnTouch(this, event)) {
finish();
return true;
}
return false;
}
看到mWindow.shouldCloseOnTouch(this, event)如果返回true，activity就会主动finish。。。
public boolean shouldCloseOnTouch(Context context, MotionEvent event) {
if (mCloseOnTouchOutside && event.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
&& isOutOfBounds(context, event) && peekDecorView() != null) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
我们看下逻辑，哪个混蛋在外部设置了mCloseOnTouchOutside为true，同时又是一个ACTION_DOWN事件，点击位置又在窗体外，decorView不为空，activity就要finish了。 是不是感觉有点意思，我们都记得对话框有这个属性，点击对话框外部，对话框消失， activity也可以表现成对话框的样式，功能也是一样的。
private boolean isOutOfBounds(Context context, MotionEvent event) {
final int x = (int) event.getX();
final int y = (int) event.getY();
final int slop = ViewConfiguration.get(context).getScaledWindowTouchSlop();
final View decorView = getDecorView();
return (x < -slop) || (y < -slop)
|| (x > (decorView.getWidth()+slop))
|| (y > (decorView.getHeight()+slop));
}
ViewConfiguration.get(context).getScaledWindowTouchSlop()这个代码跟踪一下
/**
* Distance in dips a touch needs to be outside of a window's bounds for it to
* count as outside for purposes of dismissing the window.
*/
private static final int WINDOW_TOUCH_SLOP = 16;
private ViewConfiguration(Context context) {
final Resources res = context.getResources();
final DisplayMetrics metrics = res.getDisplayMetrics();
final Configuration config = res.getConfiguration();
final float density = metrics.density;
final float sizeAndDensity;
if (config.isLayoutSizeAtLeast(Configuration.SCREENLAYOUT_SIZE_XLARGE)) {
sizeAndDensity = density * 1.5f;
} else {
sizeAndDensity = density;
}
.......
mWindowTouchSlop = (int) (sizeAndDensity * WINDOW_TOUCH_SLOP + 0.5f);
.....
/**
* @return Distance in pixels a touch must be outside the bounds of a window for it
* to be counted as outside the window for purposes of dismissing that window.
*/
public int getScaledWindowTouchSlop() {
return mWindowTouchSlop;
}
slop其实是一个根据density写死的一个敏感度的数值。
继续回到主线-------------------》getWindow().superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)
getWindow是内部一个成员变量，它怎么来的那
private Window mWindow;
。。。。。
final void attach(Context context, ActivityThread aThread,
Instrumentation instr, IBinder token, int ident,
Application application, Intent intent, ActivityInfo info,
CharSequence title, Activity parent, String id,
NonConfigurationInstances lastNonConfigurationInstances,
Configuration config, String referrer, IVoiceInteractor voiceInteractor,
Window window, ActivityConfigCallback activityConfigCallback) {
attachBaseContext(context);
mFragments.attachHost(null /*parent*/);
mWindow = new PhoneWindow(this, window, activityConfigCallback);
mWindow.setWindowControllerCallback(this);
mWindow.setCallback(this);
mWindow.setOnWindowDismissedCallback(this);
mWindow.getLayoutInflater().setPrivateFactory(this);
。。。。
}
mWindow其实是外部调用Activity.attach方法时候创建的，我们可以看到它其实是一个PhoneWindow实例，我们注意到PhoneWindow构造函数的入参有个window ，猜测一个PhoneWindow 继承于window，内部的方法又委托一个真正的window实例。应该是静态代理模式。
public class PhoneWindow extends Window implements MenuBuilder.Callback {
public PhoneWindow(Context context, Window preservedWindow,
ActivityConfigCallback activityConfigCallback) {
this(context);
mUseDecorContext = true;
if (preservedWindow != null) {
mDecor = (DecorView) preservedWindow.getDecorView();
mElevation = preservedWindow.getElevation();
mLoadElevation = false;
mForceDecorInstall = true;
getAttributes().token = preservedWindow.getAttributes().token;
}
。。。。
}
@Override
public boolean superDispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
return mDecor.superDispatchTouchEvent(event);
}
转了一圈事件来到了PhoneWindow 内部的 mDecor（DecorView）.那这个DecorView是啥那。
public class DecorView extends FrameLayout implements RootViewSurfaceTaker, WindowCallbacks {
DecorView其实是一个FrameLayout ，那它跟我们的布局又是什么关系那。
@Override
public void setContentView(int layoutResID) {
if (mContentParent == null) {
installDecor();
} else if (!hasFeature(FEATURE_CONTENT_TRANSITIONS)) {
mContentParent.removeAllViews();
}
if (hasFeature(FEATURE_CONTENT_TRANSITIONS)) {
final Scene newScene = Scene.getSceneForLayout(mContentParent, layoutResID,
getContext());
transitionTo(newScene);
} else {
mLayoutInflater.inflate(layoutResID, mContentParent);
}
mContentParent.requestApplyInsets();
final Callback cb = getCallback();
if (cb != null && !isDestroyed()) {
cb.onContentChanged();
}
mContentParentExplicitlySet = true;
}
PhoneWindow中有个setContentView(int layoutResID)方法，是不是倍感亲切。对！这个就是我们写一个activity要调用的方法，把自己写的XML布局设置进去。一般会走到这个方法mLayoutInflater.inflate(layoutResID, mContentParent);
public View inflate(@LayoutRes int resource, @Nullable ViewGroup root) {
return inflate(resource, root, root != null);
}
public View inflate(@LayoutRes int resource, @Nullable ViewGroup root, boolean attachToRoot) {
final Resources res = getContext().getResources();
if (DEBUG) {
Log.d(TAG, "INFLATING from resource: \"" + res.getResourceName(resource) + "\" ("
+ Integer.toHexString(resource) + ")");
}
final XmlResourceParser parser = res.getLayout(resource);
try {
return inflate(parser, root, attachToRoot);
} finally {
parser.close();
}
}
又遇到老朋友inflate(@LayoutRes int resource, @Nullable ViewGroup root, boolean attachToRoot) ，走题走题了，里面的东西以后再分析。就是XML解析，view一层层add进去，最后加到mContentParent ,那mContentParent是啥，肯定和decor view有关系，因为
if (mContentParent == null) {
installDecor();
} else if (!hasFeature(FEATURE_CONTENT_TRANSITIONS)) {
mContentParent.removeAllViews();
}
。。。
private void installDecor() {
mForceDecorInstall = false;
if (mDecor == null) {
mDecor = generateDecor(-1);
mDecor.setDescendantFocusability(ViewGroup.FOCUS_AFTER_DESCENDANTS);
mDecor.setIsRootNamespace(true);
if (!mInvalidatePanelMenuPosted && mInvalidatePanelMenuFeatures != 0) {
mDecor.postOnAnimation(mInvalidatePanelMenuRunnable);
}
} else {
mDecor.setWindow(this);
}
if (mContentParent == null) {
mContentParent = generateLayout(mDecor);
// Set up decor part of UI to ignore fitsSystemWindows if appropriate.
mDecor.makeOptionalFitsSystemWindows();
final DecorContentParent decorContentParent = (DecorContentParent) mDecor.findViewById(
R.id.decor_content_parent);
if (decorContentParent != null) {
mDecorContentParent = decorContentParent;
。。。。
}
我们看到mContentParent = generateLayout(mDecor);
protected ViewGroup generateLayout(DecorView decor) {
......
mDecor.startChanging();
mDecor.onResourcesLoaded(mLayoutInflater, layoutResource);
ViewGroup contentParent = (ViewGroup)findViewById(ID_ANDROID_CONTENT);
if (contentParent == null) {
throw new RuntimeException("Window couldn't find content container view");
}
..........
return contentParent;
}
/**
* The ID that the main layout in the XML layout file should have.
*/
public static final int ID_ANDROID_CONTENT = com.android.internal.R.id.content;
我们在忽略了N多行代码后找到了这个关键的部分，我们的写的XML的父节点叫content，是个FrameLayout ,这个才是大家常说的一个优化，如果你的xml根节点是FrameLayout，那可以用. merge 有什么使用限制那，我们找找
if (TAG_MERGE.equals(name)) {
if (root == null || !attachToRoot) {
throw new InflateException("<merge /> can be used only with a valid "
+ "ViewGroup root and attachToRoot=true");
}
rInflate(parser, root, inflaterContext, attrs, false);
-------------------------------》--------
void rInflate(XmlPullParser parser, View parent, Context context,
AttributeSet attrs, boolean finishInflate) throws XmlPullParserException, IOException {
final int depth = parser.getDepth();
int type;
boolean pendingRequestFocus = false;
while (((type = parser.next()) != XmlPullParser.END_TAG ||
parser.getDepth() > depth) && type != XmlPullParser.END_DOCUMENT) {
if (type != XmlPullParser.START_TAG) {
continue;
}
final String name = parser.getName();
if (TAG_REQUEST_FOCUS.equals(name)) {
pendingRequestFocus = true;
consumeChildElements(parser);
} else if (TAG_TAG.equals(name)) {
parseViewTag(parser, parent, attrs);
} else if (TAG_INCLUDE.equals(name)) {
if (parser.getDepth() == 0) {
throw new InflateException("<include /> cannot be the root element");
}
parseInclude(parser, context, parent, attrs);
} else if (TAG_MERGE.equals(name)) {
throw new InflateException("<merge /> must be the root element");
} else {
final View view = createViewFromTag(parent, name, context, attrs);
final ViewGroup viewGroup = (ViewGroup) parent;
final ViewGroup.LayoutParams params = viewGroup.generateLayoutParams(attrs);
rInflateChildren(parser, view, attrs, true);
viewGroup.addView(view, params);
}
}
if (pendingRequestFocus) {
parent.restoreDefaultFocus();
}
if (finishInflate) {
parent.onFinishInflate();
}
}
merge标签必须跟着inflate传进来的爹走，而且你写的XML在递归生成view树的时候非根节点不能用merge
走的太远了，赶紧回到DecorView
public boolean superDispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
return super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
}
DecorView 继承FrameLayout，FrameLayout又继承ViewGroup。而FrameLayout 本身没有覆写dispatchTouchEvent。 所以就是调用ViewGroup 的dispatchTouchEvent。
再说明ViewGroup 的dispatchTouchEvent 之前，我还是想先分析简单的ViewGroup 的父类 View 的dispatchTouchEvent。这样回过头看ViewGroup覆写的方法就比较简单好理解。
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
// If the event should be handled by accessibility focus first.
if (event.isTargetAccessibilityFocus()) {
// We don't have focus or no virtual descendant has it, do not handle the event.
if (!isAccessibilityFocusedViewOrHost()) {
return false;
}
// We have focus and got the event, then use normal event dispatch.
event.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
boolean result = false;
if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(event, 0);
}
final int actionMasked = event.getActionMasked();
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Defensive cleanup for new gesture
stopNestedScroll();
}
if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(event)) {
if ((mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED && handleScrollBarDragging(event)) {
result = true;
}
//noinspection SimplifiableIfStatement
ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;
if (li != null && li.mOnTouchListener != null
&& (mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED
&& li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)) {
result = true;
}
if (!result && onTouchEvent(event)) {
result = true;
}
}
if (!result && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(event, 0);
}
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP ||
actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL ||
(actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN && !result)) {
stopNestedScroll();
}
return result;
}
忽略一些滑动啊，判断啊的代码，我们主要关注
//noinspection SimplifiableIfStatement
ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;
if (li != null && li.mOnTouchListener != null
&& (mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED
&& li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)) {
result = true;
}
if (!result && onTouchEvent(event)) {
result = true;
}
}
ListenerInfo 不为空，ListenerInfo的li.mOnTouchListener存在，且view处于enabled 状态，执行li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch，如果消费掉，最终返回true…
如果以上不成立，执行view 本身的onTouchEvent 如果消费掉，返回true。
ListenerInfo是个啥？
static class ListenerInfo {
protected OnFocusChangeListener mOnFocusChangeListener;
private ArrayList<OnLayoutChangeListener> mOnLayoutChangeListeners;
protected OnScrollChangeListener mOnScrollChangeListener;
private CopyOnWriteArrayList<OnAttachStateChangeListener> mOnAttachStateChangeListeners;
public OnClickListener mOnClickListener;
protected OnLongClickListener mOnLongClickListener;
protected OnContextClickListener mOnContextClickListener;
protected OnCreateContextMenuListener mOnCreateContextMenuListener;
private OnKeyListener mOnKeyListener;
private OnTouchListener mOnTouchListener;
private OnHoverListener mOnHoverListener;
private OnGenericMotionListener mOnGenericMotionListener;
private OnDragListener mOnDragListener;
private OnSystemUiVisibilityChangeListener mOnSystemUiVisibilityChangeListener;
OnApplyWindowInsetsListener mOnApplyWindowInsetsListener;
OnCapturedPointerListener mOnCapturedPointerListener;
}
ListenerInfo 是View的静态内部类。主要负责是保存一些我们平常设置的一些监听回调，下面举个例子，设置view onclikc监听事件。
/**
* Register a callback to be invoked when this view is clicked. If this view is not
* clickable, it becomes clickable.
*
* @param l The callback that will run
*
* @see #setClickable(boolean)
*/
public void setOnClickListener(@Nullable OnClickListener l) {
if (!isClickable()) {
setClickable(true);
}
getListenerInfo().mOnClickListener = l;
}
ListenerInfo getListenerInfo() {
if (mListenerInfo != null) {
return mListenerInfo;
}
mListenerInfo = new ListenerInfo();
return mListenerInfo;
}
getListenerInfo 懒汉的味道，可以！代码处处透露着那种对内存使用上的节减和抠门。
好了，以上也可以看出用户设置的OnTouchListener监听回调是优先于view自身的onTouchEvent。再来看看View 的onTouchEvent。
public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
final float x = event.getX();
final float y = event.getY();
final int viewFlags = mViewFlags;
final int action = event.getAction();
final boolean clickable = ((viewFlags & CLICKABLE) == CLICKABLE
|| (viewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE)
|| (viewFlags & CONTEXT_CLICKABLE) == CONTEXT_CLICKABLE;
if ((viewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == DISABLED) {
if (action == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP && (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0) {
setPressed(false);
}
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
// A disabled view that is clickable still consumes the touch
// events, it just doesn't respond to them.
return clickable;
}
if (mTouchDelegate != null) {
if (mTouchDelegate.onTouchEvent(event)) {
return true;
}
}
if (clickable || (viewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
switch (action) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
if ((viewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
handleTooltipUp();
}
if (!clickable) {
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
mInContextButtonPress = false;
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
}
boolean prepressed = (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PREPRESSED) != 0;
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0 || prepressed) {
// take focus if we don't have it already and we should in
// touch mode.
boolean focusTaken = false;
if (isFocusable() && isFocusableInTouchMode() && !isFocused()) {
focusTaken = requestFocus();
}
if (prepressed) {
// The button is being released before we actually
// showed it as pressed. Make it show the pressed
// state now (before scheduling the click) to ensure
// the user sees it.
setPressed(true, x, y);
}
if (!mHasPerformedLongPress && !mIgnoreNextUpEvent) {
// This is a tap, so remove the longpress check
removeLongPressCallback();
// Only perform take click actions if we were in the pressed state
if (!focusTaken) {
// Use a Runnable and post this rather than calling
// performClick directly. This lets other visual state
// of the view update before click actions start.
if (mPerformClick == null) {
mPerformClick = new PerformClick();
}
if (!post(mPerformClick)) {
performClick();
}
}
}
if (mUnsetPressedState == null) {
mUnsetPressedState = new UnsetPressedState();
}
if (prepressed) {
postDelayed(mUnsetPressedState,
ViewConfiguration.getPressedStateDuration());
} else if (!post(mUnsetPressedState)) {
// If the post failed, unpress right now
mUnsetPressedState.run();
}
removeTapCallback();
}
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
if (event.getSource() == InputDevice.SOURCE_TOUCHSCREEN) {
mPrivateFlags3 |= PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
}
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
if (!clickable) {
checkForLongClick(0, x, y);
break;
}
if (performButtonActionOnTouchDown(event)) {
break;
}
// Walk up the hierarchy to determine if we're inside a scrolling container.
boolean isInScrollingContainer = isInScrollingContainer();
// For views inside a scrolling container, delay the pressed feedback for
// a short period in case this is a scroll.
if (isInScrollingContainer) {
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_PREPRESSED;
if (mPendingCheckForTap == null) {
mPendingCheckForTap = new CheckForTap();
}
mPendingCheckForTap.x = event.getX();
mPendingCheckForTap.y = event.getY();
postDelayed(mPendingCheckForTap, ViewConfiguration.getTapTimeout());
} else {
// Not inside a scrolling container, so show the feedback right away
setPressed(true, x, y);
checkForLongClick(0, x, y);
}
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL:
if (clickable) {
setPressed(false);
}
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
mInContextButtonPress = false;
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
if (clickable) {
drawableHotspotChanged(x, y);
}
// Be lenient about moving outside of buttons
if (!pointInView(x, y, mTouchSlop)) {
// Outside button
// Remove any future long press/tap checks
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0) {
setPressed(false);
}
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
}
break;
}
return true;
}
return false;
}
我们先分析action类型前的一些处理逻辑
final float x = event.getX();
final float y = event.getY();
final int viewFlags = mViewFlags;
final int action = event.getAction();
final boolean clickable = ((viewFlags & CLICKABLE) == CLICKABLE
|| (viewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE)
|| (viewFlags & CONTEXT_CLICKABLE) == CONTEXT_CLICKABLE;
if ((viewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == DISABLED) {
if (action == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP && (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0) {
setPressed(false);
}
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
return clickable;
}
if (mTouchDelegate != null) {
if (mTouchDelegate.onTouchEvent(event)) {
return true;
}
}
获取事件的坐标，view自身是否可点击。
一个不可用的view但是可点击，仍然会消费触摸事件，仅仅是不反馈给那些监听。
如果有mTouchDelegate，就先执行mTouchDelegate.onTouchEvent(event)的方法。
public TouchDelegate(Rect bounds, View delegateView) {
mBounds = bounds;
mSlop = ViewConfiguration.get(delegateView.getContext()).getScaledTouchSlop();
mSlopBounds = new Rect(bounds);
mSlopBounds.inset(-mSlop, -mSlop);
mDelegateView = delegateView;
}
这是一个辅助类，如果你想使被代理的View拥有更大的触摸反馈区域。
下面接着分析MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
if (event.getSource() == InputDevice.SOURCE_TOUCHSCREEN) {
mPrivateFlags3 |= PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
}
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
if (!clickable) {
checkForLongClick(0, x, y);
break;
}
if (performButtonActionOnTouchDown(event)) {
break;
}
// Walk up the hierarchy to determine if we're inside a scrolling container.
boolean isInScrollingContainer = isInScrollingContainer();
// For views inside a scrolling container, delay the pressed feedback for
// a short period in case this is a scroll.
if (isInScrollingContainer) {
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_PREPRESSED;
if (mPendingCheckForTap == null) {
mPendingCheckForTap = new CheckForTap();
}
mPendingCheckForTap.x = event.getX();
mPendingCheckForTap.y = event.getY();
postDelayed(mPendingCheckForTap, ViewConfiguration.getTapTimeout());
} else {
// Not inside a scrolling container, so show the feedback right away
setPressed(true, x, y);
checkForLongClick(0, x, y);
}
break;
if (event.getSource() == InputDevice.SOURCE_TOUCHSCREEN) {
mPrivateFlags3 |= PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
}
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
添加标记位PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN，恢复长按变量为初值。
private void checkForLongClick(int delayOffset, float x, float y) {
if ((mViewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE || (mViewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
if (mPendingCheckForLongPress == null) {
mPendingCheckForLongPress = new CheckForLongPress();
}
mPendingCheckForLongPress.setAnchor(x, y);
mPendingCheckForLongPress.rememberWindowAttachCount();
mPendingCheckForLongPress.rememberPressedState();
postDelayed(mPendingCheckForLongPress,
ViewConfiguration.getLongPressTimeout() - delayOffset);
}
}
这个其实是检测长按，可以看到其实是postDelayed发送一个延时执行的runnable mPendingCheckForLongPress 。
延时时间按默认500，实际取设置值。
/**
* @return the duration in milliseconds before a press turns into
* a long press
*/
public static int getLongPressTimeout() {
return AppGlobals.getIntCoreSetting(Settings.Secure.LONG_PRESS_TIMEOUT,
DEFAULT_LONG_PRESS_TIMEOUT);
}
/**
* Defines the default duration in milliseconds before a press turns into
* a long press
*/
private static final int DEFAULT_LONG_PRESS_TIMEOUT = 500;
意思就是触发MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN，就发个500ms延迟执行的longPress,不用说，500ms内触发了MotionEvent.ACTION_UP,肯定会有个取消这个延迟runnable.
/**
* Performs button-related actions during a touch down event.
*
* @param event The event.
* @return True if the down was consumed.
*
* @hide
*/
protected boolean performButtonActionOnTouchDown(MotionEvent event) {
if (event.isFromSource(InputDevice.SOURCE_MOUSE) &&
(event.getButtonState() & MotionEvent.BUTTON_SECONDARY) != 0) {
showContextMenu(event.getX(), event.getY());
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT;
return true;
}
return false;
}
/**
* Shows the context menu for this view.
*
* @return {@code true} if the context menu was shown, {@code false}
* otherwise
* @see #showContextMenu(float, float)
*/
public boolean showContextMenu() {
return getParent().showContextMenuForChild(this);
}
都是围绕MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN展开的一些ContextMenu，跳过。
// Walk up the hierarchy to determine if we're inside a scrolling container.
boolean isInScrollingContainer = isInScrollingContainer();
// For views inside a scrolling container, delay the pressed feedback for
// a short period in case this is a scroll.
if (isInScrollingContainer) {
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_PREPRESSED;
if (mPendingCheckForTap == null) {
mPendingCheckForTap = new CheckForTap();
}
mPendingCheckForTap.x = event.getX();
mPendingCheckForTap.y = event.getY();
postDelayed(mPendingCheckForTap, ViewConfiguration.getTapTimeout());
} else {
// Not inside a scrolling container, so show the feedback right away
setPressed(true, x, y);
checkForLongClick(0, x, y);
}
break;
检测long press会因为你在一个scrolling container,添加了更长的判断时间后再执行checkForLongClick的检测
postDelayed(mPendingCheckForTap, ViewConfiguration.getTapTimeout())
private static final int TAP_TIMEOUT = 100;
private final class CheckForTap implements Runnable {
public float x;
public float y;
@Override
public void run() {
mPrivateFlags &= ~PFLAG_PREPRESSED;
setPressed(true, x, y);
checkForLongClick(ViewConfiguration.getTapTimeout(), x, y);
}
}
先看一个比较简单的
case MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL:
if (clickable) {
setPressed(false);
}
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
mInContextButtonPress = false;
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
break;
。。。。。。
//eg:
private void removeTapCallback() {
if (mPendingCheckForTap != null) {
mPrivateFlags &= ~PFLAG_PREPRESSED;
removeCallbacks(mPendingCheckForTap);
}
}
跟他的名字一样，取消取消，复位flag，removeTapCallback，removeLongPressCallback…
case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
if (clickable) {
drawableHotspotChanged(x, y);
}
// Be lenient about moving outside of buttons
if (!pointInView(x, y, mTouchSlop)) {
// Outside button
// Remove any future long press/tap checks
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0) {
setPressed(false);
}
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
}
break;
Be lenient ：添加一个mTouchSlop敏感值。还是那句老话--------希望你善良。。。
如果是滑动手势的话，那取消tap longpress合乎情理。复位，设置down，press。
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
if ((viewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
handleTooltipUp();
}
if (!clickable) {
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
mInContextButtonPress = false;
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
}
boolean prepressed = (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PREPRESSED) != 0;
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0 || prepressed) {
// take focus if we don't have it already and we should in
// touch mode.
boolean focusTaken = false;
if (isFocusable() && isFocusableInTouchMode() && !isFocused()) {
focusTaken = requestFocus();
}
if (prepressed) {
setPressed(true, x, y);
}
if (!mHasPerformedLongPress && !mIgnoreNextUpEvent) {
removeLongPressCallback();
if (!focusTaken) {
if (mPerformClick == null) {
mPerformClick = new PerformClick();
}
if (!post(mPerformClick)) {
performClick();
}
}
}
if (mUnsetPressedState == null) {
mUnsetPressedState = new UnsetPressedState();
}
if (prepressed) {
postDelayed(mUnsetPressedState,
ViewConfiguration.getPressedStateDuration());
} else if (!post(mUnsetPressedState)) {
// If the post failed, unpress right now
mUnsetPressedState.run();
}
removeTapCallback();
}
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
眼花缭乱啊，不急，慢慢分析
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
if ((viewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
handleTooltipUp();
}
if (!clickable) {
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
mInContextButtonPress = false;
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
}
复位PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN，不可点击就取消这些鬼东西，跟cancle执行的差不多。
boolean focusTaken = false;
if (isFocusable() && isFocusableInTouchMode() && !isFocused()) {
focusTaken = requestFocus();
}
if (prepressed) {
setPressed(true, x, y);
}
public void setPressed(boolean pressed) {
final boolean needsRefresh = pressed != ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) == PFLAG_PRESSED);
if (pressed) {
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_PRESSED;
} else {
mPrivateFlags &= ~PFLAG_PRESSED;
}
if (needsRefresh) {
refreshDrawableState();
}
dispatchSetPressed(pressed);
}
获取焦点，由于ScrollingContainer之前的判断，很倔强不管如何都要执行setPressed，refreshDrawableState()这里涉及了我们那些drawable的一个状态反馈，MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN也有这个方法。
if (!mHasPerformedLongPress && !mIgnoreNextUpEvent) {
removeLongPressCallback();
if (!focusTaken) {
if (mPerformClick == null) {
mPerformClick = new PerformClick();
}
if (!post(mPerformClick)) {
performClick();
}
}
}
private final class PerformClick implements Runnable {
@Override
public void run() {
performClick();
}
}
public boolean performClick() {
final boolean result;
final ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;
if (li != null && li.mOnClickListener != null) {
playSoundEffect(SoundEffectConstants.CLICK);
li.mOnClickListener.onClick(this);
result = true;
} else {
result = false;
}
sendAccessibilityEvent(AccessibilityEvent.TYPE_VIEW_CLICKED);
notifyEnterOrExitForAutoFillIfNeeded(true);
return result;
}
能用post到 looper执行click动作，绝不直接调用。怎么滴，就要这个时间差，让其他一些状态先跑。
playSoundEffect(SoundEffectConstants.CLICK);
面试题：问你，先执行onClick还是先播放按键声音。。。。
if (mUnsetPressedState == null) {
mUnsetPressedState = new UnsetPressedState();
}
if (prepressed) {
postDelayed(mUnsetPressedState,ViewConfiguration.getPressedStateDuration());
} else if (!post(mUnsetPressedState)) {
mUnsetPressedState.run();
}
removeTapCallback();
UnsetPressedState 取消按下状态，调用 setPress(false);
终于看完了view 的 onTouchEvent.继续。。。
@Override
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(ev, 1);
}
if (ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus() && isAccessibilityFocusedViewOrHost()) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
boolean handled = false;
if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(ev)) {
final int action = ev.getAction();
final int actionMasked = action & MotionEvent.ACTION_MASK;
// Handle an initial down.
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);
resetTouchState();
}
// Check for interception.
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
intercepted = true;
}
if (intercepted || mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
// Check for cancelation.
final boolean canceled = resetCancelNextUpFlag(this)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL;
// Update list of touch targets for pointer down, if needed.
final boolean split = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_SPLIT_MOTION_EVENTS) != 0;
TouchTarget newTouchTarget = null;
boolean alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = false;
if (!canceled && !intercepted) {
View childWithAccessibilityFocus = ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus()
? findChildWithAccessibilityFocus() : null;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_DOWN)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex(); // always 0 for down
final int idBitsToAssign = split ? 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex)
: TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS;
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToAssign);
final int childrenCount = mChildrenCount;
if (newTouchTarget == null && childrenCount != 0) {
final float x = ev.getX(actionIndex);
final float y = ev.getY(actionIndex);
final ArrayList<View> preorderedList = buildTouchDispatchChildList();
final boolean customOrder = preorderedList == null
&& isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();
final View[] children = mChildren;
for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(
childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View child = getAndVerifyPreorderedView(
preorderedList, children, childIndex);
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != null) {
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != child) {
continue;
}
childWithAccessibilityFocus = null;
i = childrenCount - 1;
}
if (!canViewReceivePointerEvents(child)
|| !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
continue;
}
newTouchTarget = getTouchTarget(child);
if (newTouchTarget != null) {
// Child is already receiving touch within its bounds.
// Give it the new pointer in addition to the ones it is handling.
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
break;
}
resetCancelNextUpFlag(child);
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) {
// Child wants to receive touch within its bounds.
mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime();
if (preorderedList != null) {
// childIndex points into presorted list, find original index
for (int j = 0; j < childrenCount; j++) {
if (children[childIndex] == mChildren[j]) {
mLastTouchDownIndex = j;
break;
}
}
} else {
mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex;
}
mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX();
mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY();
newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign);
alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true;
break;
}
// The accessibility focus didn't handle the event, so clear
// the flag and do a normal dispatch to all children.
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
if (preorderedList != null) preorderedList.clear();
}
if (newTouchTarget == null && mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
// Did not find a child to receive the event.
// Assign the pointer to the least recently added target.
newTouchTarget = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (newTouchTarget.next != null) {
newTouchTarget = newTouchTarget.next;
}
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
}
}
}
// Dispatch to touch targets.
if (mFirstTouchTarget == null) {
// No touch targets so treat this as an ordinary view.
handled = dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, canceled, null,
TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS);
} else {
// Dispatch to touch targets, excluding the new touch target if we already
// dispatched to it. Cancel touch targets if necessary.
TouchTarget predecessor = null;
TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (target != null) {
final TouchTarget next = target.next;
if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) {
handled = true;
} else {
final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child)
|| intercepted;
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild,
target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) {
handled = true;
}
if (cancelChild) {
if (predecessor == null) {
mFirstTouchTarget = next;
} else {
predecessor.next = next;
}
target.recycle();
target = next;
continue;
}
}
predecessor = target;
target = next;
}
}
// Update list of touch targets for pointer up or cancel, if needed.
if (canceled
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
resetTouchState();
} else if (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_UP) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex();
final int idBitsToRemove = 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex);
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToRemove);
}
}
if (!handled && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(ev, 1);
}
return handled;
}
我们先挑简单的分析吧
// Handle an initial down.
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Throw away all previous state when starting a new touch gesture.
// The framework may have dropped the up or cancel event for the previous gesture
// due to an app switch, ANR, or some other state change.
cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);
resetTouchState();
}
/**
* Cancels and clears all touch targets.
*/
private void cancelAndClearTouchTargets(MotionEvent event) {
if (mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
boolean syntheticEvent = false;
if (event == null) {
final long now = SystemClock.uptimeMillis();
event = MotionEvent.obtain(now, now,
MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL, 0.0f, 0.0f, 0);
event.setSource(InputDevice.SOURCE_TOUCHSCREEN);
syntheticEvent = true;
}
for (TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget; target != null; target = target.next) {
resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child);
dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(event, true, target.child, target.pointerIdBits);
}
clearTouchTargets();
if (syntheticEvent) {
event.recycle();
}
}
}
private void resetTouchState() {
clearTouchTargets();
resetCancelNextUpFlag(this);
mGroupFlags &= ~FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT;
mNestedScrollAxes = SCROLL_AXIS_NONE;
}
MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN 事件初始化，很多东西设置初值
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
检测拦截，ViewGroup 比View多了一个onInterceptTouchEvent方法。这个方法是否运行取决于 MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN事件或者mFirstTouchTarget不等于空，并且 子类没有调用父类的public void requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(boolean disallowIntercept)
if (disallowIntercept == ((mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0)) {
// We're already in this state, assume our ancestors are too
return;
}
if (disallowIntercept) {
mGroupFlags |= FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT;
} else {
mGroupFlags &= ~FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT;
}
// Pass it up to our parent
if (mParent != null) {
mParent.requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(disallowIntercept);
}
这个方法主要是设置自身标识位，且要求父类不要拦截MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN事件，很明显这个方法会一直递归向父类。
大家用内部方法解决滑动冲突的时候用的比较多。
事件分发有个特点就是你处理了 MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN，那后面的你照单全收。保证处理一个完整的事件序列。
if (newTouchTarget == null && childrenCount != 0) {
final float x = ev.getX(actionIndex);
final float y = ev.getY(actionIndex);
// Find a child that can receive the event.
// Scan children from front to back.
final ArrayList<View> preorderedList = buildTouchDispatchChildList();
final boolean customOrder = preorderedList == null
&& isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();
final View[] children = mChildren;
for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(
childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View child = getAndVerifyPreorderedView(
preorderedList, children, childIndex);
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != null) {
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != child) {
continue;
}
childWithAccessibilityFocus = null;
i = childrenCount - 1;
}
if (!canViewReceivePointerEvents(child)
|| !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
continue;
}
newTouchTarget = getTouchTarget(child);
if (newTouchTarget != null) {
// Child is already receiving touch within its bounds.
// Give it the new pointer in addition to the ones it is handling.
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
break;
}
resetCancelNextUpFlag(child);
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) {
// Child wants to receive touch within its bounds.
mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime();
if (preorderedList != null) {
// childIndex points into presorted list, find original index
for (int j = 0; j < childrenCount; j++) {
if (children[childIndex] == mChildren[j]) {
mLastTouchDownIndex = j;
break;
}
}
} else {
mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex;
}
mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX();
mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY();
newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign);
alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true;
break;
}
// The accessibility focus didn't handle the event, so clear
// the flag and do a normal dispatch to all children.
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
if (preorderedList != null) preorderedList.clear();
}
代码大意就是倒序看子view，因为后加的view在z轴上部，所以肯定是优先处理事件，然后对比状态和事件坐标是否这个view有资格处理，接着调用dispatchTransformedTouchEvent
private boolean dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(MotionEvent event, boolean cancel,
View child, int desiredPointerIdBits) {
final boolean handled;
// Canceling motions is a special case. We don't need to perform any transformations
// or filtering. The important part is the action, not the contents.
final int oldAction = event.getAction();
if (cancel || oldAction == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL) {
event.setAction(MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL);
if (child == null) {
handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
} else {
handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
}
event.setAction(oldAction);
return handled;
}
// Calculate the number of pointers to deliver.
final int oldPointerIdBits = event.getPointerIdBits();
final int newPointerIdBits = oldPointerIdBits & desiredPointerIdBits;
// If for some reason we ended up in an inconsistent state where it looks like we
// might produce a motion event with no pointers in it, then drop the event.
if (newPointerIdBits == 0) {
return false;
}
// If the number of pointers is the same and we don't need to perform any fancy
// irreversible transformations, then we can reuse the motion event for this
// dispatch as long as we are careful to revert any changes we make.
// Otherwise we need to make a copy.
final MotionEvent transformedEvent;
if (newPointerIdBits == oldPointerIdBits) {
if (child == null || child.hasIdentityMatrix()) {
if (child == null) {
handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
} else {
final float offsetX = mScrollX - child.mLeft;
final float offsetY = mScrollY - child.mTop;
event.offsetLocation(offsetX, offsetY);
handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
event.offsetLocation(-offsetX, -offsetY);
}
return handled;
}
transformedEvent = MotionEvent.obtain(event);
} else {
transformedEvent = event.split(newPointerIdBits);
}
// Perform any necessary transformations and dispatch.
if (child == null) {
handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(transformedEvent);
} else {
final float offsetX = mScrollX - child.mLeft;
final float offsetY = mScrollY - child.mTop;
transformedEvent.offsetLocation(offsetX, offsetY);
if (! child.hasIdentityMatrix()) {
transformedEvent.transform(child.getInverseMatrix());
}
handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(transformedEvent);
}
// Done.
transformedEvent.recycle();
return handled;
}
大家最主要关注的是
if (child == null) {
handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
} else {
handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
}
二选一 不是子类继续用dispatchTouchEvent处理， 就是ViewGroup 用父类View的 dispatchTouchEvent处理事件，View.dispatchTouchEvent上面已经提过，在这里，就是相当于ViewGroup自己处理了呗。 到这里相信大家已经或多或少从诸多细节中把握了view树的事件传递。才疏学浅，希望不要误人子弟！！！