Video link:
Editor's review comments:
- references:
Eliminate multiple citations (avoid a simple background statement followed by multiple references)
Reference style: refer to the journal's reference style for the exact format of these documents, as well as the use of punctuation and capitalization
- Insufficient review of references in the introduction
- Add meaning, quantification, and comparison to the conclusion
- delete redundant function words
- Citation of article data (numbers over 1000 need to add separators, including numbers in tables and figures)
- check format subscript
- note unit abbreviation
- Commit revisions with revision mode + clear version
Check the journal requirements, what version should be submitted after revision
Common review questions:
- The highlights of the article are wrong (not the focus of the research, for example, the contribution description part of the introduction is inconsistent with the actual contribution of the article)
- The highlight part is missing
Highlight reference link: How to write highlights when submitting a manuscript? - Zhihu
- The type of article is like a report, not like a thesis
- Insufficient novelty of the article (should answer whether this work fills some knowledge gap that previous articles cannot address?)
- Embody the value of this paper (the author says more specifically to provide the contribution of this study)
- What is the focus of this research
- Abstract needs to be rewritten
- The introduction is a bit off topic (need to focus on citing literature that is highly related to the background of the article)
- The introduction is unclear
- Insufficient references in literature review
- Insufficient introduction of research methods
- The application object is new but the method is old (old wine in new bottle)
- Advantages and disadvantages of the research method
- Discussion is not deep enough
- Insufficient contrast in the discussion section
- Discussion section adds enlightenment
- Discussion section adds quantitative advice
- conclusion needs refining
- The conclusion section states the contribution of the article
- Language needs professional revision
- Format to follow author guidelines
- unclear
- Add line and page numbers
- The format needs to be unified (figures, tables, formulas)
- Charts should be placed in the text
- Add image summary