Click the card below to follow the " CVer " official account
AI/CV heavy dry goods, delivered in the first time
Click to enter —>【Computer Vision】WeChat Exchange Group
The review of China Nature is divided into several parts:
1. For the evaluation of talents (excellent youth, outstanding youth, etc.) and key projects, defense is required at the conference , and the relevant defense notice will be notified and confirmed 3 weeks in advance .
2. The applicants will not be notified of projects without defense . For projects that need to be defended, the review needs to notify the applicant himself separately.
3. The largest subject category (youth, general, regional) review does not need to be defended at the meeting ; it is only selected based on the situation of subject review experts who have discussed the meeting.
4. Overseas excellent youth project , since the first selection in 2021, this year is the third; after discussion and selection at the meeting, it will be submitted to relevant departments for final determination.
5. The project types of the defense generally fall into the following categories: group, basic center, outstanding youth, excellent youth, key (key national cooperation), major instrument, original exploration, major project, and individual notification defense.
So what are the standards for ordinary project conferences?
1. The concept of meeting
"At the meeting" refers to successfully passing the initial review, and successfully entering the stage of meeting review (meeting review) after communication review (letter review) and summary analysis of review opinions.
Figure 1 National Natural Review Process
2. Understand the scoring criteria and know the scores of the meeting
Each academic department generally assigns different scores to the comprehensive evaluation and funding opinions . Under normal circumstances, A in the comprehensive evaluation corresponds to 4 points, B corresponds to 3 points, C corresponds to 2 points, and D corresponds to 1 point; A in the funding opinion corresponds to 4 points, B corresponds to 2 points, and C does not count. The final meeting score (total score) = comprehensive score + funding opinion points . See Figure 3 for details.
Figure 3 Fund Score Calculation Method
All items will be automatically ranked and graded according to the total score . Generally, the top 12% are category I items , 12% to 30% are category II items , and the rest are category III items . In principle, category I projects must be funded (unless there are special circumstances, such as innovation, publication of papers in dubious journals, missing content, etc.), less than half of category II projects can be funded, and category III projects will not participate in the review and will not be funded automatically. The focus of the review is to determine which category I projects are abnormal and which category II projects should be funded.
According to the evaluation status of the NSFC over the years, taking general projects (generally 5 letter evaluation experts) and youth projects (generally 3 letter evaluation experts) as examples, the total score and the corresponding situation of whether to attend the meeting are explained. See Table 1 and Table 2 for details.
Table 1 5 letter evaluation scores and attendance status (approximately 30% attendance rate)
(Generally, projects with a total score ≥ 5 points can go to the conference, and projects with a comprehensive evaluation ≥ 3.2 points have a 70% probability of passing the conference review)
Note: A comprehensive evaluation of C will significantly increase points. If there is D, it is basically impossible to meet, so this table does not have the situation of D.
Table 2 3 letter evaluation scores and attendance status (approximately 30% attendance rate)
(Generally, projects with a total score ≥ 5 points can go to the conference, and projects with a comprehensive evaluation ≥ 3.2 points have a 70% probability of passing the conference review)
Note: A comprehensive evaluation of C will significantly increase points. If there is D, it is basically impossible to meet, so this table does not have the situation of D.
Attachment: Diagram of the 2023 "responsibility, credibility, and contribution" review mechanism pilot work diagram (https://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab434/info89197.htm)
Copyright Notice
Reprinted from: Scientific Research Master | Source: Science and Education Station, Teacher Dabing said that scientific research, network, science award center, the copyright belongs to the original author, and it is only used for academic sharing
Click to enter —>【Computer Vision】WeChat Exchange Group
ICCV/CVPR 2023 Paper and Code Download
Background reply: CVPR2023, you can download the collection of CVPR 2023 papers and code open source papers
后台回复：ICCV2023，即可下载ICCV 2023论文和代码开源的论文合集目标检测和Transformer交流群成立
扫描下方二维码，或者添加微信：CVer333，即可添加CVer小助手微信，便可申请加入CVer-目标检测或者Transformer 微信交流群。另外其他垂直方向已涵盖：目标检测、图像分割、目标跟踪、人脸检测&识别、OCR、姿态估计、超分辨率、SLAM、医疗影像、Re-ID、GAN、NAS、深度估计、自动驾驶、强化学习、车道线检测、模型剪枝&压缩、去噪、去雾、去雨、风格迁移、遥感图像、行为识别、视频理解、图像融合、图像检索、论文投稿&交流、PyTorch、TensorFlow和Transformer等。
一定要备注：研究方向+地点+学校/公司+昵称（如目标检测或者Transformer+上海+上交+卡卡），根据格式备注，可更快被通过且邀请进群
▲扫码或加微信号: CVer333，进交流群
CVer计算机视觉（知识星球）来了！想要了解最新最快最好的CV/DL/AI论文速递、优质实战项目、AI行业前沿、从入门到精通学习教程等资料，欢迎扫描下方二维码，加入CVer计算机视觉，已汇集数千人！
▲扫码进星球
▲点击上方卡片，关注CVer公众号It's not easy to organize, please like and watch