22 Postgraduate Entrance Examinations, 390+, and Master of Computer Science, Jilin University, 941

On 22nd, I took the postgraduate entrance examination and got a master's degree in computer science from Jilin University, with a total score of 390+. Let me share the learning methods of each subject. There are already many detailed strategies for reviewing public courses. I will mainly describe the review of professional courses. In Jilin University's computer science postgraduate entrance examination, there is still a big difference in professional course scores. I think this is also a matter of greater concern to all the students who are taking the Jilin University entrance examination. I applied for a master's degree in computer science and technology, but I failed to pass the professional courses. By 130 points, my professional course subjects are: data structure, operating system, computer composition principles and computer network. Next, I will describe the review experience of these four courses.

First of all, the first subject I started reviewing was data structure. I think most candidates feel the same as me. Understanding data structure algorithms and codes takes a lot of energy and time, so I suggest that we invest more in the data structure course. Much time and effort. I took some detours during the review process, and I share them with you here. I hope you can learn from my experience. In the early stage, I saw that Jilin University had the same exam subjects as 408. I didn’t read the red book handouts and sample questions carefully. I naively thought that I could just review according to 408, so I first watched the 408 Data Structure online course and did the 408 sample questions. After completing all these tasks , it has taken me a long time, and I planned to test my own level, so I took out the real questions from the data structure part of Jilin University in previous years to do it. I found that Jilin University’s exam focus is different from that of the 408 exam. I don’t know many key questions in Jilin University. It is well mastered, and there are some test contents that are very important in 408. They are not the focus here in Jilin University. I wasted a lot of time and energy in reviewing according to 408 in the early stage.

I corrected this problem when I reviewed the other three subjects. I hope that my fellow students can also learn from my experience and review according to the red book from the beginning. This will save a lot of time and help them grasp the key points. Next, I read the Red Book handouts step by step and did the example questions in the Red Book. After completing these two tasks, I had a preliminary understanding of the key points of the Jilin University exam. Then, I started to do the real questions on the data structure part over the years. When I started to get started , I found that the algorithm questions had no ideas and it was difficult to write codes. I could only try to understand the algorithm ideas and code writing by referring to the answers in the red book. But don’t be frustrated. Everyone was like this at the beginning, so after mastering the basic short answer questions, I focused my review on algorithm questions. The red book is very considerate and has a section that summarizes classic algorithm questions. I can review it very conveniently. The first step is to understand the idea of ​​the algorithm, and then I have to try to write the code. It was very difficult because I had forgotten the syntax of C language, but by referring to the code examples given in the red book and searching online, I could quickly recall them. At the same time, I insisted on doing the real questions and final questions, and summarized the experience of Jilin University through doing the questions. The key content of the exam, for some key algorithms, I recited on the basis of understanding, so that I could write it down easily. After actually setting foot in the exam room, I found that my work was not in vain. I could do both algorithm questions on data structure. Come up with rewritten answers to some classic algorithm questions.

The detailed review process of these three subjects: operating system, computer composition principles, and computer network are very similar. I only provide you with some review ideas here. In the first round of review process, these three subjects were conducted separately. I reviewed them in the order of computer composition principles, operating systems, and computer networks. I think that more time needs to be invested in the computer composition principles in these three subjects. Because the content of this subject is relatively large and difficult to understand. For the review of these three subjects, I first read the red book handouts and did the sample questions in the red book. Through this step, I had a preliminary understanding of the basic knowledge and the key points of the exam. Then, I started to do the real questions from previous years. The first I did a lot of questions this time and I didn’t know the answer standards and methods, so this time I basically compared the answers. By looking at the answers, I had a deeper understanding of the problem-solving standards and the key points of the exam. Next, I did the final questions. I found that some of the final questions overlapped with the real questions, but there were also many questions and test points that had not been tested in the real questions. Therefore, if you have enough time, you should still do the final questions. The above work was my first round of review.

Next comes the second round of review. At this stage, four professional courses are conducted at the same time. You mainly rely on doing real questions to review, because you always refer to the answers when you do it for the first time. This time you have to formally and seriously do the real questions. Now, do the real questions of these four courses at the same time. In the process of doing the real questions, you will find that some knowledge points of some subjects have been forgotten for too long without review. But don’t panic, this is the meaning of the second round of review, to check for omissions. To fill in the gaps, we think we forgot because we haven’t done the questions for too long. In fact, as long as we find this knowledge point in the Red Book handouts, we can quickly recall it and have a deeper impression. The process of review is like this, constantly forgetting and remembering. After finishing the real questions, I started to focus on the final questions. After finishing the final questions, it was almost time for the exam. At this time, I returned to the real questions again and reviewed my wrong questions to ensure that I had mastered these questions (reprinted).

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/weixin_40020400/article/details/125464017