Some time ago, I saw a topic. The hero is an annual income of 300,000 programmers, dating back to the home, and the woman had both each have a crush, but grab an annual income of 50,000 civil servants, and ultimately himself playing with toys.
This has led to a wide-ranging discussion, paying job really can not compare these stable job? This is not only related to personal career development, but also to a lot of people's marriages and values. I believe that different people may give different answers, we need to take into account all aspects of the factors.
First, from the reality of the problem, each person is born family already different, then the expected value of the future is different.
If a person already born poorer, parents finally took him home, bringing up, brothers and sisters are struggling to climb, then there is no doubt that the person in the case of health conditions permit, in general, will select a number of busy relatively high-paying jobs, rather than selecting a stable salary. Too many real problems in front of us, parents pension problem in the future, their future married and issues, as well as inner longing for a better life. We live in an age of advanced networks, and too many temptations before us the contrast.
If a person born in the family home in very good condition, will work to choose a stable salary it? I think there may be a small part will do, pursue more free time. Most of it will be because the platform itself superior to the average person, even if not so hard, is very stable, it does not mean that will be low-paid. And above that case, does not mean it will certainly busy paying.
Now there is a theory called working poor, that is the number of young people look busy all day, from dawn to dusk, but struggled at the end of subsistence, live their own life feel very tired, and even said that very little hope. What is the reason behind this in the end is? In fact, the combined result of many factors, one thing you can ask is, does not mean that the struggle busy, want a good future path, look farther, is more meaningful struggle.
A lot of things, all fish and bear's paw relationship, can not have both. But apart from the nature of work and stability, social status or civil servants currently much higher than the programmer, this intangible value should also be included in the scope of consideration.