This is a relatively subjective evaluation, gold data collection questionnaire issued. Once a quarter, after practice, more often, it will submit data to produce fatigue, so once a quarter, just right.
Way: set up evaluation and the person being evaluated, import tools, automatically sends a questionnaire to evaluate the person's mailbox tool.
QA Leaders QA personnel assessment, the corresponding assessment project:
| Numbering | QA | definition |
| 1.1 | Explore issues | Understand the products they tested, familiar with the needs of each Sprint, and can analyze the test point |
| 1.2 | Test Case | Test cases covering a comprehensive and timely updates (include performance use cases, automation use cases and use case functionality, integration) |
| 1.3 | Issue Tracking | Tracking and team collaboration, and part of the solution schedule QA feedback |
| 1.4 | Working efficiency | Extremely proactive, serious and responsible attitude, to be a conscientious |
| 1.5 | Learning ability | It has increased, to share their knowledge reserves |
| 1.6 | Early warning capability | Products within the clan served with the insight to stand QA angle foreseeable risks and throw the problem, take the initiative to do the tracking and timely feedback |
| 1.7 | Automation capabilities | You can do timely maintenance of automation use cases and scripts |
| 1.8 | Values | Whether correct values |
| 1.9 | Line quality situation | Whether Omission / or online QA major accident caused by the emergence of |
Manager appraisal QA Leader, project assessment:
| Numbering | QA Leader | definition |
| 1.1 | Team Management | With efficient upstream and downstream integration testing coordination skills; collaboration reasonable task, can lead the QA team to enhance the overall efficiency |
| 1.2 | Test Case | Has a perfect integration test cases, mind maps and flow charts; synergistically in practice partner opened a small idea of the extended test point, so a more comprehensive test cases; Review and check test work, tracking the implementation of test cases |
| 1.3 | Communication skills | Jihuan can distinguish the severity of the problem, with precise problem identification and the ability to convey to the team, so that internal and external communication smooth. At the same time when internal and external experience problems, can lead us to analyze the problem in the short-term agreement |
| 1.4 | Learning ability | Good to explore and learn more about testing methods, can lead the team to practice and learn together |
| 1.5 | Early warning capability | Products within the clan served with the insight to stand QA angle foreseeable risks and throw the problem, take the initiative to do the tracking and timely feedback |
| 1.6 | Automation capabilities | Upstream and downstream data simulated product involved, we must have the corresponding Kunlun Case, and updated in real time to achieve; also need to choose the right combination of product and automation solutions to enhance the efficiency of credible |
| 1.7 | Values | Whether correct values |
Evaluation dimensions partners:
| Evaluation dimensions | Partner evaluator | I want to say to him | ||||||
| RTE | PO | Dev | SM | TO | QA | Devops | ||
| Initiative | ||||||||
| Test quality | ||||||||
| Values |
Score accounted for:
| Ratings range | definition | QA Leader | QA | |||
| 5 | Out of 5 | Ratings dimensions | Weights | Ratings dimensions | Weights | |
| 4 | 4.0 to 4.9 points | Higher | 60% | Higher | 60% | |
| 3 | Pass line 3.0 - 3.9 points | PO | PLO | 20% | PO | PLO | 20% | |
| 2 | Interviews require 2.0 to 2.9 points | same level | 10% | same level | 20% | |
| 1 | Failing 1.0-1.9 points | subordinate | 10% |